Total Pageviews

Tuesday, February 19, 2019

(revised) Why I call modern climate science; "junk science"

Slightly revised 
on February 21, 2019:

If someone you knew 
with a science degree,
predicted the world 
would be hit 
by an asteroid,
ending all life 
on our planet,
and repeated 
his prediction 
on December 31 
every year,
you might 
believe him
for a few years.

If nothing happened,
after many years, 
you'd lose interest
in his annual prediction.

After over 50 years 
of hearing the same 
gloomy December 31
prediction, would you 
still take his prediction 
seriously ?

Of course not !



Members of 
the 'CO2 is evil 
climate change cult' 
love annual 'bad news
is coming' climate 
change predictions.

The wild guess 
bad news is coming 
predictions of the 
future climate,
are their "science"
-- junk science !

They don't care 
that the predictions
are always wrong !

In real science,
wrong predictions
falsify a theory.

In junk science,
wrong predictions
do not matter !



The CO2 is evil cult
NEVER stop believing 
annual predictions 
of a coming bad news
climate change 
disaster ! 

They are like children 
who love to hear 
a scary bedtime story
again and again !




Today, in 2019, 
the 'CO2 is evil cult'
still believes the
scary climate 
change predictions,
after over 50 years
of wrong predictions !

They demonstrate
an amazing level 
of gullibility !





"Climate Change"
is mainly wild guess
predictions of a 
coming climate 
change disaster,
that never comes !

Some leftists are now 
claiming climate change 
is an "existential threat" !

A "threat" they will 
attack with a radical
"Green Bad Dream".

The "Green Bad Dream"
seems like it is 
intended to destroy
US capitalism,
and convert the US 
into a socialist, 
or Marxist, nation.

Former bartender, 
Dumbocrat "Alexandria 
Occasionally Coherent",
so dumb that she makes
Trump seem like a genius,
leads the "Green Bad Dream",
and is a "gift" for Republicans, 
that keeps on giving !




I've been reading 
climate science 
since 1997,
as a hobby.

I started this blog 
in 2014, as a 
public service,
simply because the
mainstream media 
was only publishing
scary climate change 
articles, while the actual
climate was getting better
and better, over the years !

Many Americans
have been brainwashed
into fearing climate change,
after a mere +1 degree C. 
of global warming 
since 1880, 
which was
138 years ago !

The mainstream media 
makes sure Americans
don't know their government
claims a mere +1 degree C.
of global warming since 1880.

The lack of 
global warming
since 2003 
is also ignored !

But the mainstream media 
makes sure Americans 
repeatedly hear left wing 
politicians warning that 
climate change is an
"existential threat", 
that must be eliminated
in the next dozen years,
without asking for proof !

In reality, we have 
over 150 years of 
experience with 
global warming --
the average temperature 
of our planet might 
increase +0.1 degree C.,
or decline -0.1 degree C.
in the next ten years. 

So what?

No one actually knows
if the average temperature
will be higher, or lower,
in the next ten years,
... and that's an 
"existential threat" ?




Readers of this blog 
get my summaries of
the best climate science
articles and studies 
I read every week.

I try to keep the 
summaries simple,
and format them 
to be easy to read
on smart phones.

My interest 
is real science.

I try to use real science
to refute the junk science 
of mainstream media's
"climate change"
( the wrong, wild guess
predictions of the 
future climate ).

Based on 
real science,
adding CO2
to the atmosphere
is beneficial: 
'Greening our planet', 
and accelerating the 
growth of "C3" plants 
used for food by 
humans and animals.




If any of the mild 
global warming 
since 1940 was 
actually caused by CO2,
from burning fossil fuels,
( a reasonable assumption 
but based only on lab experiments, 
so the assumption is not a fact )
that's good news too !

Greenhouse gas warming 
should be greatest when
and where the climate is dry, 
otherwise the greenhouse effect
of water vapor will overwhelm
the greenhouse effect of CO2.

That means 
CO2 warming 
would be greatest at:

(1)
Higher latitudes,
far from the equator,

(2)
During the six coldest,
driest months of the year, 
not the six warmest,
most humid, months, 
and

(3)
Mainly at night, rather 
than mainly during the day.


(1), (2) and (3) describe 
the actual warming
in the Arctic, since 1975,
which is the best evidence 
of greenhouse warming.


But not Antarctica,
where East Antarctica 
is gaining ice, and 
West Antarctica 
is losing some ice.

"Global warmunists" 
deceive people
with their focus on the 
small loss of ice mass 
in West Antarctica, 
and never mention 
larger ice mass gains 
in East Antarctica ! 

West Antarctica
only has small areas
of local melting,
always near the ocean, 
and that could not 
be a pattern of 
greenhouse warming.

CO2 should warm
the entire atmosphere, 
which should warm
the entire ocean, 
not small areas
of the ocean.

The actual cause 
of the melting,
in some locations
on the edges of 
West Antarctica,
has only one logical 
explanation:

Geothermal activity from 
underseas volcanoes
is responsible for 
the local losses
of ice mass, 
not CO2, which 
would have to affect 
the entire continent.

The lack of 
overall warming
of Antarctica 
is evidence
that CO2 
does NOT cause 
global warming !




If you're concerned 
about real pollution, 
and you should be,
focus on the pollution in
Chinese and Indian cities,
where fossil fuels are too
often burned without 
modern pollution controls.

The result is visible, 
real air pollution, 
that harms our planet.

CO2 emissions 
from burning 
fossil fuels
are good news,
greening our planet,
but the other chemical 
emissions from burning
fossil fuels are 
harmful pollution !

Air pollution in China
is so bad that some 
drifts east and reaches 
the US "left coast" ! 

Maybe that explains 
some of the strange 
behavior on the U.S.
"left coast" ?