Since the 1960s green pressure groups have grown rich through constant scaremongering, with ever-changing imaginary "catastrophes, from:
- Over population growth,
- DDT,
- Other pesticides,
- Acid rain,
- Ozone holes,
- Genetically modified crops, etc.
The green organizations that exaggerated the most, got the most money.
The environmental catastrophes they predict are always in the distant future, so they can never be refuted.
These green organizations have infiltrated climate science, the EPA, and the media -- they are doing everything they can to halt economic growth and population growth, both of which they hate.
Climate modelers, and the journalists who cover them, have become cheerleaders for climate change scaremongering.
Vicious left-wing bloggers police the internet to verbally (on-line) attack anybody who disagrees.
These climate fascists insist on stamping out all thoughts that climate change might not be lethal.
They sure must hate me -- I am positive the climate change since the cool, low-CO2, mid-1800s has been great news for people, animals and plants, so I favor more warming, and more CO2.
Today’s climate "science" has degenerated into wild guesses of the climate in 50 to 100 years, ignoring huge bodies of real evidence, and treating computer games as real data.
Geologists, however, have never found any correlation of rising temperature with increasing levels of CO2, which they say varied from 200 ppm (0.02%) to 7,000 ppm (0.7%), based on their climate proxy studies to figure out Earth's past climate.
.
The CO2 fall from 7,000 ppm was mainly due to removal of CO2 in marine skeletal material to form vast limestone deposits during the Cambrian Period.
The ocean could not have been acidic at that time, or the limestone would have dissolved.
The present CO2 level is near 400 ppm (0.04%).
This could double only if all the known fossil fuel reserves were burned.
Geologists say the world was hotter 8,000 years ago, 130,000 years ago, and for millions of years while life evolved on our planet.
The IPCC uses only ice core studies for their historical (pre-1959) CO2 levels, for which ice cores are an inaccurate data source, but ignore historical temperature data from the same ice cores, for which ice cores are a good data source.
Below are temperature estimates based on ice core studies.
These charts show large changes in temperature, not caused by CO2, and often very abrupt changes, at the locations of the ice cores:
