Governments pay climate modelers to play computer games and predict a climate "crisis" … that will never happen.
The governments then claim only they can prevent the alleged "crisis" by seizing more control over the private sector of the economy.
This is a scam that gives governments exactly what they paid for -- more power to:
(1) Regulate the private sector,
(2) Reward political contributors in alternate (expensive) energy industries,
(3) (in the future) collect extra tax revenues from new taxes on corporate energy use, and/or corporate CO2 emissions, and
(4) Falsely claim they are trying to save the Earth.
Today, people, animals and green plants should be enjoying the great climate (except in polluted China).
Today, we have the best climate since the Maunder Minimum, from 1645 to 1715, when solar activity was unusually low, and it was unusually cold on Earth.
Unfortunately, politicians are scaring people with bogus predictions that climate change will end life on Earth as we know it.
There have been 40 years of grossly inaccurate climate model predictions, yet they keep coming at us, faster and scarier than ever.
The 'coming climate change catastrophe' prediction has nothing to do with real science, and is not similar to any climate event in the past 4.5 billion years discovered by geologists – the climate predictions are northing more computer game 'climate astrology' used for climate scaremongering.
Most scientists, outside of the well-paid small group of climate modelers on the government dole, think these climate computer games have no predictive ability and/or are a waste of money.
Few scientists are willing to speak out, however, because they risk their jobs, grants and retirement income, after being attacked by smarmy leftists as "deniers" ... from the Pope, to the US President.
The climate change 'fascists' silence questions and debate by calling their opposition hostile names such as "climate deniers", "fools", and much worse!
It’s an upside down world when the Pope, the biggest believer in anti-science creationism, is giving the world climate "science" lectures!
Here are many quotes from
“unsettled scientists” who were brave enough to speak publicly:
Quotes by David Dilley,
former US Air Force and NOAA meteorologist. After leaving the Air Force with the rank of Captain, he joined the NOAA's National Weather Service (NWS) and was Meteorologist in Charge at a NWS office:
"For over 15 years an inordinate proportion of government and corporate research grants have been awarded to universities for a single specific purpose: to prove human activities and the burning of fossil fuels are the main driving mechanisms causing global warming."
"Many former research department heads, such as Dr. Reid Bryson (known as the Father of Climatology), openly state that research grants are driven by politics, and in order to receive a government grant you have to play the game. Topics for grants go with the political wind."
"In the mid 1990s government grants were typically advertised in such a way to indicate that conclusions should show a connection to human activity as the cause for anthropogenic global warming. The result: most of the research published in journals became one-sided and this became the primary information tool for media outlets."
Dilley joins a growing list of professors, Nobel Prize winners, scientists, and other meteorologists, who do not buy into the idea that CO2 levels control global temperatures:
Quote by Ivar Giaever,
Nobel prize winner for physics:
“I am a skeptic … global warming has become a new religion.”
Quote by Kary Mullis,
Nobel Prize winner for chemistry:
“Global warmers predict that global warming is coming, and our emissions are to blame. They do that to keep us worried about our role in the whole thing. If we aren’t worried and guilty, we might not pay their salaries. It’s that simple.”
Quote by Dr. Will Happer,
award winning physicist, Professor at the Department of Physics at Princeton University, and Former Director of Energy Research at the Department of Energy from 1990 to 1993, who has published over 200 scientific papers, and is a fellow of the American Physical Society, The American Association for the Advancement of Science, and the National Academy of Sciences:
“I have spent a long research career studying physics that is closely related to the greenhouse effect, for example, absorption and emission of visible and infrared radiation, and fluid flow. Based on my experience, I am convinced that the current alarm over carbon dioxide is mistaken.”
Quote by Thomas B. Gray,
former head of Space Services branch of NOAA, and researcher in NOAA’s Environmental Research Laboratories:
“Nothing that is occurring in weather or in climate research at this time can be shown to be abnormal in the light of our knowledge of climate variations over geologic time…The claims of those convinced that AGW is real and dangerous are not supported by reliable data.”
Quote by John McLean,
climate data analyst, Australian Climate Science Coalition:
“The IPCC leads us to believe that this statement ['it is very highly likely that greenhouse gas forcing has been the dominant cause of the observed global warming over the last 50 years'] is very much supported by the majority of reviewers. The reality is that there is surprisingly little explicit support for this key notion. Among the 23 independent reviewers [of the IPCC report] just 4 explicitly endorsed the chapter with its hypothesis.”
Quote by Vincent Gray,
climate scientist, and expert reviewer on every single draft of the IPCC reports:
“The [IPCC] ‘Summary for Policymakers’ might get a few readers, but the main purpose of the report is to provide a spurious scientific backup for the absurd claims of the worldwide environmentalist lobby that it has been established scientifically that increases in carbon dioxide are harmful to the climate. It just does not matter that this ain’t so.”
Quote by Eduardo Zorita,
from the UNs IPCC:
“The Summary for Policy Makers is co-written by government officials and scientists, and thus it seems that it is result of some type of obscure negotiations. This leads to all sorts of wrong incentives, also for scientists. In some countries, a criterion for promotion is whether your work has been cited by IPCC, this gives already an idea about how IPCC reports are misused for goals totally alien to intended purpose”
Quote by Hans von Storch,
a UN IPCC Lead Author:
“Certainly the greatest mistake of climate researchers has been giving the impression that they are declaring the definitive truth… By doing so, we have gambled away the most important asset we have as scientists: the public’s trust.”
Quote by Dr. Jim Buckee,
PhD in Astrophysics from Oxford University, who lectured about climate change at the University of Aberdeen:
“[climate skepticism] is the dominant view in professional science circles. I know lots of people in universities and so on and quite often they have to retire before they can say what they want because it’s so frowned upon. Any dissension is like a heresy. People are stamped on so they can’t be heard.”
Quote by Delgado Domingos,
environmental scientist:
“Creating an ideology pegged to carbon dioxide is a dangerous nonsense … The present alarm on climate change is an instrument of social control, a pretext for major businesses and political battle. It became an ideology, which is concerning.”
Quote by Will Harper,
Princeton University physicist, and former Director of Energy Research at the Department of Energy:
“I had the privilege of being fired by Al Gore, since I refused to go along with his alarmism….I have spent a long research career studying physics that is closely related to the greenhouse effect … Fears about man-made global warming are unwarranted and are not based on good science. The earth’s climate is changing now, as it always has. There is no evidence that the changes differ in any qualitative way from those of the past.”
Quote by Martin Keeley,
geology scientist:
“Global warming is indeed a scam, perpetrated by scientists with vested interests, but in need of crash courses in geology, logic and the philosophy of science.”
Quote by Eduardo Tonni,
paleontologist, Committee for Scientific Research, Argentina:
“The [global warming] scaremongering has its justification in the fact that it is something that generates funds.”
Quote by George Kukla,
climatologist, research scientist with the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory at Columbia University:
“The only thing to worry about is the damage that can be done by worrying. Why are some scientists worried? Perhaps because they feel that to stop worrying may mean to stop being paid.”
Quote by James Spann,
American Meteorological Society-certified meteorologist:
“Billions of dollars of grant money are flowing into the pockets of those on the man-made global warming bandwagon. No man-made global warming, the money dries up. This is big money, make no mistake about it. Always follow the money trail and it tells a story.”
Quote by Tom McElmurry,
meteorologist, former tornado forecaster in Severe Weather Service:
“Governmental officials are currently casting trillions down huge rat hole to solve a problem which doesn’t exist. … Packs of rats wait in that [rat] hole to reap trillions coming down it to fill advocates pockets. … The money we are about to spend on drastically reducing carbon dioxide will line the pockets of the environmentalists. … Some politicians are standing in line to fill their pockets with kick back money for large grants to the environmental experts. … In case you haven’t noticed, it is an expanding profit-making industry, growing in proportion to the horror warnings by government officials and former vice-presidents.”
Quote by Claude Culross,
organic chemistry:
“Dire predictions of catastrophe from that bottomless pit of disasters du jour, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, are based solely on computer models that amount to poorly crafted mathematical opinions, not experimental proof. … There is no proof that man-made carbon dioxide causes additional warming, or that carbon-dioxide reduction would reduce warming.”
Quote by Ritesh Arya,
geologist, specialist in hydrogeology and groundwater resources in the Himalayas:
“There is urgent need to put the phenomenon [global warming], which had not been triggered off suddenly, in the right perspective. … There is a hype of global warming created by western mass media and there is a need to redefine the whole concept.”
Quote by John Takeuchi,
meteorologist:
“The atmosphere has periodic warming and cooling cycles. The sun is the primary source of energy impacting the earth’s surface. That energy heats the land and the seas, which then warm the air above them. Water vapor and other gases in the atmosphere also affect temperature. … Oceans are the main repository for CO2. They release CO2 as their temperature rises – just like your beer. This strongly suggests that warming oceans – heated by the sun – are a major contributor to CO2 in the atmosphere.”
Quote by Peter Dailey,
Director of Atmospheric Science, AIR Worldwide:
“There is now a near consensus that global air temperatures are increasing, however, there is no consensus on how this has affected the temperature of the world’s oceans, and in particular in the Atlantic Ocean, or how much of the recent warming trend is attributable to man’s activities.”
Quote by Mark Paquette,
meteorologist, Accuweather:
“The Earth’s climate is ridiculously complicated, and carbon dioxide is not the only thing that influences the climate that is changing. In fact, probably EVERYTHING in the earth’s climate system changes at one time or another. So, earth’s changing climate can not be entirely attributed to carbon dioxide levels rising.”
Quote by Ian McQueen,
chemical engineer:
“Carbon dioxide is not the bogeyman – there are other causes that are much more likely to be causing climate change, to the extent that it has changed." … Carbon dioxide does have a small warming effect, McQueen said, but 32 per cent of the first few molecules do the majority of the warming. The carbon dioxide content of the atmosphere, he said, is currently at 380 parts per million; if that were upped to 560 parts per million, "Earth’s temperature would only rise about 0.3 degrees.”
Quote by Art Raiche,
former chief research scientist, Australia’s Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization:
“The suppression of scientific evidence that contradicts the causal link between human-generated CO2 and climate has been of great concern to ethical scientists both here in Australia and around the world. … The eco-hysteria that leads the Greens, as well as the left-leaning media, to attack any person who attempts to publish science that contradicts their beliefs is a gross example of the dangerous doctrine that the end justifies the means.”
Quote by Kevin Warwick,
Professor of cybernetics-University of Reading, England, doing research in artificial intelligence, control, robotics:
“I am afraid that I do not hold with the theory of ‘global warming’ – there will always be climate change. … Big thing here is – do we know what we are doing that is bringing about climate change? At present the answer to this is NO.”
Quote by Tim Patterson,
Paleoclimatologist of Carlton University in Ottawa:
“I taught my students that CO2 was the prime driver of climate change,” Patterson wrote on April 30, 2007. Patterson said his “conversion” happened following his research on “the nature of paleo-commercial fish populations in the NE Pacific.”
“[My conversion from believer to climate skeptic] came about approximately 5-6 years ago when results began to come in from a major NSERC (Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada) Strategic Project Grant where I was PI (principle investigator),” Patterson explained.
“Over the course of about a year, I switched allegiances,” he wrote. “As the proxy results began to come in, we were astounded to find that paleoclimatic and paleoproductivity records were full of cycles that corresponded to various sun-spot cycles.
About that time, [geochemist] Jan Veizer and others began to publish reasonable hypotheses as to how solar signals could be amplified and control climate,” Patterson noted.
Patterson says his conversion:
"Probably cost me a lot of grant money. However, as a scientist I go where the science takes me and not where activists want me to go.”
Patterson now asserts that more and more scientists are converting to climate skeptics when he said:
“When I go to a scientific meeting, there’s lots of opinion out there, there’s lots of discussion (about climate change). I was at the Geological Society of America meeting in Philadelphia in the fall and I would say that people with my opinion were probably in the majority,”
Quote by William C. Gilbert,
a research chemist who published an August 2010 study in the journal Energy & Environment, titled “The thermodynamic relationship between surface temperature and water vapor concentration in the troposphere”, and an August 2009 study titled “Atmospheric Temperature Distribution in a Gravitational Field.”
“I am ashamed of what climate science has become today.”
“The science community is relying on an inadequate model to blame CO2 and innocent citizens for global warming in order to generate funding and to gain attention. If this is what ‘science’ has become today, I, as a scientist, am ashamed.”
Quote by Dr. Christopher J. Kobus,
Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Oakland University, specializing in alternative energy, thermal transport phenomena, two-phase flow and fluid and thermal energy systems:
“The whole thing (coming climate change catastrophe) is a fraud.”
Quote by Dr. Hans Jelbring,
Swedish Climatologist of the Paleogeophysics and Geodynamics Unit at Stockholm University:
“The dysfunctional nature of the climate sciences is nothing short of a scandal. Science is too important for our society to be misused in the way it has been done within the Climate Science Community.” The global warming establishment “has actively suppressed research results presented by researchers that do not comply with the dogma of the IPCC.”
Quote by Andrei Kapitsa,
Russian geographer and Antarctic ice core researcher:
“ (the IPCC is) the biggest ever scientific fraud” and – “A large number of critical documents submitted at the 1995 UN conference in Madrid vanished without a trace. As a result, the discussion was one-sided and heavily biased, and the UN declared global warming to be a scientific fact.”
Quote by Dr. Art Raiche,
former Chief Research Scientist with Australia’s Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization:
“The suppression of scientific evidence that contradicts the causal link between human-generated CO2 and climate has been of great concern to ethical scientists both herein Australia and around the world.”
Quote by Hilton Ratcliffe,
South African astrophysicist and member of the Astronomical Society of Southern Africa (ASSA), and the Astronomical Society of the Pacific and a Fellow of the British Institute of Physics:
“The whole idea of anthropogenic (manmade) global warming is completely unfounded… it’s fraud.”
Quote by Dr. Jarl R. Ahlbeck,
scientist and chemical engineer at Abo Akademi University in Finland, author of 200 scientific publications, and former Greenpeace member:
“Real measurements give no ground for concern about a catastrophic future warming.”
Quote by Dr. Michael Beenstock,
Hebrew University Professor and an honorary fellow with Institute for Economic Affairs who published a study challenging man-made global warming claims titled “Polynomial Cointegration Tests of the Anthropogenic Theory of Global Warming.”:
“Predictions of significant global warming in the 21st century by IPCC are not supported by the data.”
Quote by Dr. George T. Wolff,
atmospheric scientist, and former adjunct professor in the Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Michigan, author of more than 90 peer-reviewed studies in the fields of ozone, sulfates and aerosols:
“For too many in the (Climate Science) field, critical thinking, the basis for all scientific inquiry, is not only absent, it is disdained.”
Quote by Geraldo LuÃs Lino,
Brazilian geologist:
“Hundreds of billion dollars have been wasted with the attempt of imposing an Anthropogenic (manmade) Global Warming theory that is not supported by physical world evidences. … AGW has been forcefully imposed by means of a barrage of scare stories and indoctrination that begins in the elementary school textbooks.”
Quote by Willis Eschenbach,
a climate researcher who has published climate studies in Energy and Environment Journal:
“I am definitely a critic of the IPCC, they are doing their job abysmally poorly. Rather than advance the cause of climate science, they impede it through their reliance on bad statistics, bad economics, and bad data”.
Quote by Dr. Jim Sprott,
consulting chemist and forensic scientist in New Zealand:
“The much-vaunted IPCC scenarios are patently wrong. The manmade climate change proposition fails”.
Quote by Hal Lewis,
a prominent physicist who resigned from American Physical Society, saying:
“Global warming the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life.”
Quote by Dr. Dennis Hollars,
astrophysicist:
“What I’d do with the IPCC report is to put it in the trash can because that’s all it’s worth.”
Quote by Dr. Roger W. Cohen,
an American Physical Society (APS) fellow:
“I was … appalled at the behavior of many of those who helped produce the IPCC reports and by many of those who promote it. In particular I am referring to the arrogance; the activities aimed at shutting down debate; the outright fabrications; the mindless defense of bogus science, and the politicization of the IPCC.”
Quote by Michael J. Myers,
analytical chemist who specializes in spectroscopy and atmospheric sensing:
“…man-made global warming is ‘junk’ science.”
Quote by KNMI,
the Dutch meteorological institute:
“We believe that limiting the scope of the IPCC to human induced climate change is undesirable, especially because natural climate change is a crucial part of the total understanding of the climate system, including human-induced climate change.”
Quote by Antonis Christofides and Nikos Mamassis,
Greek Earth scientists of the National Technical University of Athens’ Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering, statement:
“We maintain there is no reason whatsoever to worry about man-made climate change, because there is no evidence whatsoever that such a thing is happening.”
Quote by Dr. Pal Brekke,
senior advisor to the Norwegian Space Centre in Oslo, renowned Norwegian Solar physicist who published more than 40 peer-reviewed scientific articles on the sun and solar interaction with the Earth:
“Anyone who claims that the (climate change) debate is over and the conclusions are firm has a fundamentally unscientific approach to one of the most momentous issues of our time.”
and Dr. Brekke warns global temperatures may
“actually fall in the course of a 50-year period”.
Quote by Dr. Zbigniew Jaworowski,
Physicist and Chairman of the Central Laboratory for the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Radiological Protection in Warsaw:
“At the beginning of the 1970s I believed in man-made climate cooling, and therefore I started a study on the effects of industrial pollution on the global atmosphere, using glaciers as a history book on this pollution,” Dr. Jaworowski, wrote on August 17, 2006.
“With the advent of man-made warming political correctness in the beginning of 1980s, I already had a lot of experience with polar and high altitude ice, and I have serious problems in accepting the reliability of ice core CO2 studies (used by the IPCC)", Jaworowski added.
Jaworowski dismissed the UN IPCC summary and questioned what the actual level of C02 was in the atmosphere in a March 16, 2007 report in EIR science entitled “CO2: The Greatest Scientific Scandal of Our Time.”
“We thus find ourselves in the situation that the entire theory of man-made global warming—with its repercussions in science, and its important consequences for politics and the global economy—is based on ice core studies that provided a false picture of the atmospheric CO2 levels,” Jaworowski wrote.
“For the past three decades, well-known direct CO2 measurements, recently compiled and analyzed by Ernst-Georg Beck (Beck 2006a, Beck 2006b, Beck 2007), were completely ignored by climatologists—and not because they were wrong. Indeed, these measurements were made by several Nobel Prize winners, using the techniques that are standard textbook procedures in chemistry, biochemistry, botany, hygiene, medicine, nutrition, and ecology. The only reason for rejection was that these measurements did not fit the hypothesis of anthropogenic climatic warming. I regard this as perhaps the greatest scientific scandal of our time.”
Quote by Dr. Tad Murty,
Climate researcher and former Senior Research Scientist for Fisheries and Oceans in Canada:
“I started with a firm belief about global warming, until I started working on it myself, I switched to the other side in the early 1990s when Fisheries and Oceans Canada asked me to prepare a position paper and I started to look into the problem seriously,”
Quote by Dr. Ian D. Clark,
Paleoclimatologist professor of the Department of Earth Sciences at University of Ottawa:
“I used to agree with these dramatic warnings of climate disaster. I taught my students that most of the increase in temperature of the past century was due to human contribution of C02. The association seemed so clear and simple. Increases of greenhouse gases were driving us towards a climate catastrophe. However, a few years ago, I decided to look more closely at the science and it astonished me. In fact there is no evidence of humans being the cause. There is, however, overwhelming evidence of natural causes such as changes in the output of the sun."
This has completely reversed my views on the Kyoto Protocol,” Clark explained. “Actually, many other leading climate researchers also have serious concerns about the science underlying the [Kyoto] Protocol,” he added.
Quote by Dr. Nir Shaviv,
astrophysicist and one of Israel’s top award winning scientists:
“Like many others, I was personally sure that CO2 is the bad culprit in the story of global warming. But after carefully digging into the evidence, I realized that things are far more complicated than the story sold to us by many climate scientists or the stories regurgitated by the media.”
Also see his paper at:
Quote by Don Aitkin,
University of Canberra, founder and past chairman of the Australian Mathematics Trust:
“Why is there such insistence that AGW has occurred and needs drastic solutions? This is a puzzle, but my short answer is that the IPCC has been built on the AGW proposition and of course keeps plugging it, whatever the data say. The IPCC has considerable clout. Most people shy off inspecting the evidence because it looks like science and must therefore be hard. The media have been captured by AGW (it makes for great stories), the environmental movement and the Greens love it, and business is reluctant to get involved.”
Dr. David Evans,
mathematician & engineer who did carbon accounting for the Australian Government:
“I devoted six years to carbon accounting, building models for the Australian government to estimate carbon emissions from land use change and forestry. When I started that job in 1999 the evidence that carbon emissions caused global warming seemed pretty conclusive, but since then new evidence has weakened the case that carbon emissions are the main cause. I am now skeptical.”
Dr. Reid Bryson,
Meteorologist, and the founding chairman of the Department of Meteorology at University of Wisconsin (now the Department of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences, was pivotal in promoting the coming ice age scare of the 1970’s has now converted into a leading global warming skeptic.
Bryson was on the United Nations Global 500 Roll of Honor and was identified by the British Institute of Geographers as the most frequently cited climatologist in the world.
Quote by Dr. Claude Allegro,
geophysicist and a top geophysicist and French Socialist who has authored more than 100 scientific articles, written 11 books and received numerous scientific awards including the Goldschmidt Medal from the Geochemical Society of the United States:
Allegre, who was one of the first scientists to sound global warming fears 20 years ago, now says the cause of climate change is “unknown”.