Total Pageviews

Monday, July 10, 2017

Global Circulation "Models" - Part Two

The climate change fantasy is a global warming fantasy.

The climate change fantasy is that adding man made CO2 to the air, from burning fossil fuels, will cause runaway warming that will eventually end all life on earth.

When we skeptics point out that earth's atmosphere had more CO2 than today for most of the past 4.5 billion years, with no runaway warming, we are ridiculed and called anti-science.

The truth is there is absolutely no science behind the runaway warming fantasy -- and the term "climate change" is propaganda to obscure the runaway warming belief.

There are some government bureaucrats with science degrees who say what they are required to say by their political appointee bosses ... just like cigarette companies got the "science" they paid for, when claiming cigarettes were safe!

We are not told government bureaucrat "scientists" are hired ONLY if they say they believe the climate change fantasy, and keep their jobs only if they predict the fantasy will happen.

And they "predict" the fantasy by claiming they have very sophisticated global circulation "models" that are so complex they must be run on super-computers!

It's long past time to stop calling them climate "models".

If they make wrong predictions for 30 years, then they are not real models.

They have made grossly inaccurate predictions for 30 years.

They are not models.

They are personal opinions of government bureaucrats about what causes climate change, translated into computer language, and used by the computers to "predict" what the modelers believed all along -- the climate change fantasy. 

But calling them models does not make them real models!

Real models are a summary of a very well understood process.

Climate change is not a well understood process.

Therefore, a real climate model is impossible to construct.

Before there can be a real climate model,
there must be a correct climate physics model.

The government bureaucrats use “CO2 controls the climate” as their climate physics model.

That is not the correct physics model.

There is no correct climate physics so far.

That's why there can be no real climate model.

When government bureaucrats use their so-called global circulation models as the entire "proof" of the climate change fantasy, they deserve ridicule and laughter.


The average temperature, often called "the climate", is wonderful in 2017.

The average temperature has barely changed in 150 years.

The average temperature right now is almost the same as it was in the early 2000s.


Note: 

Even if there was a 100% correct climate physics model, that could be used as the foundation for a 100% correct global circulation model, that still does not mean the future climate would be predictable.