Claims of a
“scientific consensus”
about global warming
are a myth.
When you hear the "97%" myth,
the number will be based on an extremely
biased "survey", or abstract-counting
exercise, that starts with the "97%"
conclusion, and then does anything
required to support that number.
Honesty and fairness are not principles
that guide leftist surveys!
A group of Canadian retired Earth
and atmospheric scientists, called
themselves "Friends of Science".
They produced a 2014 report that
reviewed four popular
climate change surveys
and abstract-counting exercises
that I will summarize
in the next four articles.
Friends of Science claim
an honest conclusion based
on all the data received,
without selective editing,
would have been:
(A)
Oreskes actually found
only 1.2% agreement,
(B)
Doran and Zimmerman
actually found only 3.4% agreement,
(C)
Anderegg et al. actually found
66% agreement, and
(D)
Cook et al. actually found
only 0.54% agreement.
There is no 97%, 98% or 100% consensus
on human-caused global warming,
as claimed in these four fake studies.
Modern climate "science"
was the original fake news,
consisting only of wrong
wild guess predictions
of the future climate,
repeated every year
for the past 30 years,
with the leftist-biased
mainstream press
consistently ignoring
how inaccurate the
predictions have been.
It should be no surprise
the fake news is supported by
fake consensus "studies".
(Not that real science is based
on a vote of scientists).
In the history of science,
a "consensus" was strong
evidence that the underlying
science was wrong --
-- ranging from slightly wrong,
to completely wrong.
Progress in real science
is almost always from individuals,
or small teams, that prove the
scientific consensus was wrong,
often after years of facing
character attacks!
Following are four articles
summarizing the four most
popular fake surveys.
The surveys are used to
support consistently dishonest
modern climate science, which consists of government
bureaucrats claiming a coming
climate catastrophe, to ensure
their own job security!
(1)
Predict a climate crisis
every year.
every year.
(2)
Reason given:
" Because we have
science degrees,
science degrees,
and we say so ! "
(3)
Claim you must be right,
because almost everyone
you know agrees with you !
(4)
Claim that 97% of scientists agree,
so the science must be "settled"
(as if science is ever settled!).