Total Pageviews

Friday, September 21, 2018

At the global warming rate since 1950, it would take at least 600 years for +2 degrees C. of global warming ( from 15 degrees C. global average, to 17 degrees C. global average ).

Not that +2 degrees C. 
global warming
means anything bad -
the average temperature 
of our planet 
has already increased 
at least 2 degrees C.
from the 1690s to 2018, 
and anecdotal evidence 
from the late 1600s 
strongly shows
people HATED 
the cold weather 
-- so the warming 
since then 
was GOOD news !


We all agree that 
climate changes.

We all agree, 
the world has become 
slightly warmer 
in the past 120 years.

We all agree, 
the observed increase 
in CO2 concentration 
in the atmosphere 
is due to human activity: 
such as burning fossil fuels 
and other industrial activity.

Based on simple lab experiments,
adding CO2 to the atmosphere 
should cause some amount 
of global warming, 
but how much is unknown.

We all agree 
the CO2 concentration 
in our atmosphere 
is increasing 
about 2 ppm/year, 
which is about half
of human emissions. 

The other half 
of human emissions
is absorbed 
by the ocean 
and biosphere.

We don't agree
on this real science:
If fossil fuels 
are burned responsibly 
to limit real pollutants 
such as ash, 
oxides of nitrogen,
oxides of sulfur, 
heavy metals, etc., 
the CO2 released 
benefits the world. 

Any resulting climate change 
will be small, and harmless
but there will be major benefits 
to plant life.

Scientific truth has never been 
determined by a vote,
or consensus,

In fact, consensuses 
have often been 
completely wrong.

Winter is warming 
more than summer 
and nights more than days, 
which does suggest 
greenhouse gas warming 
rather than warming 
from solar energy variations


Atmospheric CO2 levels today 
are much lower than 
during almost any time 
in the history of life on Earth. 

CO2 concentrations have been 
much higher than today 
over most of the history of life
on our planet. 

There were ice ages 
in the Ordovician,
450 million years ago, 
when the CO2 levels were 
several thousand ppm.


The weak case 
that CO2 is the
dominant influence
on the climate 
is based on 
excessive faith in 
computer climate models.

Models blur the lines between 
reality and virtual reality. 

All claims of dangerous warming 
from greenhouse gases 
come from computer models.

Over the past 
550 million years, 
when abundant fossils 
first appeared 
in the sedimentary record, 
CO2 levels have averaged 
many thousands of 
parts per million (ppm), 
not today’s few hundred ppm.

At 150 ppm, many plants 
would die of CO2 starvation.

More CO2 is good for the world, 
which has been in a CO2 famine 
for tens of millions of years 
-- one or two thousand ppm 
would be ideal for the biosphere. 

Hysterical attempts 
to drive CO2 levels 
below 350 ppm, 
or some other value, 
are not science.

Over most of the geological history 
of the Earth, CO2 levels have been 
much higher than now. 

Yet ocean acidification 
was not a problem; 
corals flourished, leaving 
extensive fossil reefs 
for us to study today.

The only effect 
of more atmospheric CO2 
over the past century,
that no one debates,
has been the 
satellite-observed 
'greening of the Earth'.

The claim that more CO2 
has led to more extreme weather, 
including tornadoes, hurricanes, 
droughts, floods, blizzards, etc.
are lies, not based on data.

Extreme weather 
is not increasing. 

The current sea level rise 
of about 2 mm/year would give 
about 20 cm, or 8 inches, 
of sea level rise over a century. 

For comparison, 
at Coney Island, 
Brooklyn, NY, 
the sea level 
at high tide 
is typically 
four feet higher 
than at low tide.

For poor people 
-- most of those 
living on Earth --
depriving them 
of the benefits 
of affordable, 
reliable energy 
from fossil fuels, 
that can't be replaced
by the intermittent, 
inefficient  
alternative energy, 
from low density 
energy sources 
such as solar energy 
or wind power,
is immoral.

Climate models don’t work.

They have predicted 
almost three times
more warming 
than has been 
observed.


Even if you assumed 
that CO2 caused 100%
of the warming since 1950
( with no scientific proof 
that is true, and then extrapolated
that worst case warming rate 
into the future ), 
that only means
it would take
at least 600 years 
for the average
global temperature 
to rise +2 degrees C.
( from about 15 degrees C.,
to about 17 degrees C. )