It's What You "Know", That Isn't So, That Causes the Most Trouble in Modern Climate "Science"

Government 

bureaucrats 

with science degrees

don't understand 

climate change, 

but think they do.

To deonstrate,

their great "knowledge",

they predict the future

average temperature 

every year 

( the same prediction 

30 years in a row ) 

and their prediction ... 

turns out to be wrong !

They predict 2.5x to 3.0x

the global warming that 

actually happens.

And of course they predict

constant warming -- so they

missed the lack of warming

from 2003 to mid-2015,

in weather satellite data.

They also missed the lack of

warming in Anatarctica

since the 1960s, other than

a few small areas on the edge,

next to underwater volcanoes.

It's what 
you 'know', 

that isn't so, 

that causes

the most trouble. 

Modern climate "science" 

suffers from that disease. 

People who admit to

"I don't know" 

have the correct answer

for climate science.

No one knows what 

the future climate will be,

and no one knows exactly,
or even roughly, 

what causes climate change,
beyond a list of likely suspects. 

Based on the consistently
wrong predictions 

for the past 30 years, 

we can rule out the current theory:

( CO2 controls the average temperature 

and a doubling of the CO2 level

will cause +3 degrees C. of global warming ).

Unfortunately,

actual temperature data 

do not change the weak minds

in modern climate "science".

They stick with 

the same +3 degrees C. 

per CO2 level doubling
decade after decade

( since 1979 ), 

like a scared child 

with a "security blanket".

Even though 
actual warming since 1979 

has been at the rate of 

+1 degree C. 

per CO2 level doubling,

not +3 degrees C.
per CO2 doubling !

The climate models 

(computer games)

incorrectly predict 

+3 degrees warming

per CO2 doubling.

Except for one Russian model,

that makes good predictions,

but we can't trust Russia,

can we?

Of course +1 degree C.

per CO2 level doubling

merely assumes CO2 is 
the ONLY cause of warming,

which even the UN's IPCC 

does not claim,

( IPCC claims, 

without proof, 

"over 50%" ).

so +1 degree C., 

per CO2 level doubling, 

is a worst case estimate,

and that worst case estimate 

tells us doubling CO2 levels 

would be harmless !

My climate change blog

will improve your knowledge

of basic climate science,

but I can't tell you what the

future climate will be,
because no one can,

nor can I tell you exactly

what causes climate change,
because no one can !

I can tell you our planet had

4.5 billion years of natural 

climate change.

I can tell you my property

in Bingham Farms, Michigan

was under more than a mile

of ice 20,000 years ago.

I can tell you the ice melted

from natural causes, not CO2

greenhouse warming.

The climate alarmists would 

have us believe that natural

climate change suddenly 

stopped in 1950, 
and from then on, 
only humans 

caused climate change.

They never even try to tell us

how that could have happened, 

or why that might happen, 

because it did not happen, 

and is nonsense.

Of course "nonsense" is not a

scientific term -- the proper term

for modern climate "science",

which is mainly computer games

that make wrong climate predictions,

refusals to debate "settled science",
as if any science is ever "settled"

and childish character attacks 
on skeptics with real data, 
rather than "confuser models" ...

Modern climate "science" is 
a large, steaming pile of farm animal digestive waste products,
politely called "junk science"!