Total Pageviews

Thursday, December 27, 2018

US Weather Station Comedy, with photographs ! This surface weather station network is supposed to be the best in the world ... ha ha, ha !

Climate change 
is studied as a 
global phenomenon.

A global phenomenon
supported by 
local and national 
temperature data.

A majority of our planet
has no local temperature data,
so the numbers must be
wild guessed by 
government bureaucrats
to compile a global
average temperature.

But the 
global estimates
of average 
temperature, 
sea-level rise, etc.
are mainly (over 50%)
computer 
model-derived 
abstractions, 
largely irrelevant 
to climate reality, 
at specific locations 
around the world.

No one actually 
lives in the
"average global
temperature".




Challenging the accuracy
of US weather station data:

The U.S. surface 
temperature record 
has long been viewed
as the most accurate 
and complete 
of the national records 
relied on by scientists 
to estimate global 
temperature trends, 
so shortcomings 
are likely to be 
even greater 
in other countries !


A U.S. program 
measures the
surface ambient 
air temperatures
at a network of
surface weather
stations.

About a decade ago,  
Anthony Watts, 
a meteorologist, 
recruited a team of 
“citizen scientists” 
to photograph some 
of the climate-monitoring 
stations in the 
U.S. Historical 
Climatology Network 
(USHCN) 
overseen by the 
National 
Weather Service, 
a department of the 
National Oceanic 
and Atmospheric 
Administration (NOAA), 
which is part of the 
Commerce Department.

The goal was to see 
if those stations 
complied with 
NOAA’s own 
quality standards 
(Watts, 2009). ( a )

The team eventually 
surveyed 82.5% 
of the stations. 

“We were shocked 
by what we found,” 
Watts wrote:

"We found stations 
located next to the 
exhaust fans of 
air conditioning units, 
surrounded by 
asphalt parking lots 
and roads, 
on blistering- hot 
rooftops, 
and near sidewalks 
and buildings 
that absorb 
and radiate heat."

"We found 68 stations 
located at wastewater 
treatment plants, 
where the process of 
waste digestion 
causes temperatures 
to be higher than 
in surrounding areas. "

"In fact, we found that 
89 percent of the stations
 – nearly 9 of every 10
 – fail to meet the 
National Weather Service’s
own siting requirements 
that stations must be 
30 meters (100 feet) 
or more away from 
an artificial heating 
or radiating / reflecting 
heat source (p. 1)."

“In other words, 
9 of every 10 stations 
are likely reporting 
higher or rising 
temperatures 
because they are 
badly sited. "

"We observed that 
changes in 
the technology 
of temperature stations 
over time also 
has caused them 
to report a false 
warming trend. "

"We found major gaps 
in the data record 
that were filled in 
with data from 
nearby sites, a practice 
that propagates and 
compounds errors."

"We found that 
adjustments 
to the data 
by both NOAA ,
and another 
government agency, 
NASA, cause 
recent temperatures 
to look even higher” 




A report by the 
U.S. Government 
Accountability Office 
confirmed 
Watts’ findings, 
and urged NOAA 
to improve the quality 
of its surface station 
network. 
(GAO, 2011) (b)

NOAA agreed with 
GAO’s findings 
and identified 
a subset 
of the USHCN 
consisting only of 
supposedly high-quality 
climate-monitoring 
stations complying with 
its siting standards. 




In 2011, Watts 
and several colleagues 
examined “the differences 
between USHCN temperatures 
and North American 
Regional Reanalysis 
(NARR) 
temperatures” 
( the temperature 
record produced 
by the subset of 
higher-quality 
stations )
and found 
“the most poorly 
sited stations 
are warmer 
compared 
to NARR".

"According to the 
best-sited stations, 
the diurnal (day-night)
temperature range 
in the lower 48 states 
has no century-scale trend” 
(Fall et al., 2011) (c)


References:
(a)
Watts, A. 2009: 
Is the U.S. 
Surface Temperature 
Record Reliable? 
Chicago, IL: 
The Heartland Institute.


(b)
GAO. 2011:
Climate Monitoring: 
NOAA can improve 
management of the U.S. 
Historical Climatology Network. 
Washington, DC: 
Government Accountability Office. 
August.



(c)
Fall, S., Watts, A., Nielsen-Gammon, 
J., Jones, E., Niyogi, D., Christy, J., 
and Pielke Sr., R.A. 2011: 
Analysis of the impacts 
of station exposure 
on the U.S. Historical 
Climatology Network 
temperatures and 
temperature trends. 
Journal of Geophysical Research 
116: D14120. doi:10.1029/2010JD015146.





Pictures of Poorly Sited 
Surface Weather Stations: