The specific language
used at the recent
Katowice, Poland
climate summit,
was mainly about
a transfer of wealth
among nations.
Climate Change News
published a list of
32 "technical terms"
that they think
were important
at Katowice.
Not one word
on their list
concerned
climate science.
40% of the
"technical terms"
refer to interest groups.
What I would call
a 'new world order',
was called
"international
cooperation".
There were five
wealth transfer terms.
(1)
"Cooperation"
is actually
huge payments,
from developed (rich)
countries,
to developing (poor)
countries.
(2)
Another term was
“climate finance”,
which is about
developed countries
paying for everything
developing countries
do to stop, or adapt to,
climate change.
Annual payments
of $100 billion
are supposed to
begin in 2020 !
(3)
“Loss and damage"
is 'compensation for'
damage caused
by climate change,
which appears
to include any
bad weather.
The preliminary
UN estimate
for that loss
and damage
is $400 billion
a year !
(4)
“Technology transfer”
is another wealth term.
Companies that
hold patents
will waive them,
to allow the
developing
countries
to manufacture
the patented stuff
for free!
(5)
“Nationally
Determined
Contributions”,
are what
each country
promises to do,
to reduce their
CO2 emissions.
The NDCs are
“climate targets”,
to be renewed
every five years.
The Katowice
"climate summit"
was mainly about
a huge wealth transfer
from developed countries,
to poor countries,
with overall control
of the process,
and the decision-making,
led by the United Nations.
Every bureaucracy
places its advancement
ahead of the interests
of those who pay for it.
The UN is no different.
The UN, please recall,
has countries like Cuba
and Saudi Arabia
sitting on the
Human Rights Council,
voting to condemn Israel,
even as Hamas rockets
rain down on Israel,
from Gaza.
The true intent
of the UN is actually
called Agenda 21,
a Marxist / Socialist
roadmap for the UB
to become more of
a One World
Government.
Climate change
is the main vehicle
for the UN
to move towards
their goal.
The liberal - biased
mainstream media
seem to accept that
the United Nations
has the authority
to demand anything,
of any nation.
More evidence of
the wealth transfer goals,
of climate change zealots,
from the past:
(1)
The early
climate summits,
such as Rio, in 1992,
included the term
“contraction
and convergence”,
with the clear goal
of forcing economies
of the western world
to strengthen
the economies of
third world.
(2)
Margaret Thatcher,
from her 2002 book
STATECRAFT:
“The doomsters’
favorite subject today
is climate change.
This has a number
of attractions for them.
First, the science is
extremely obscure,
so they cannot easily
be proved wrong.
Second, we all
have ideas
about the weather:
traditionally,
the English,
on first acquaintance,
talk of little else.
Third, since clearly
no plan to alter climate
could be considered
on anything
but a global scale,
it provides a
marvelous excuse
for worldwide,
supra-national
socialism.”
Ottmar Edenhofer,
co-chair of the IPCC’s
Working Group III,
explained in
precise German:
“we are in fact
redistributing
the world’s wealth
by climate policy
… one must
free oneself
of the delusion
that climate policy
is [about]
environmental
policy.”