Modern
climate "science"
is mainly
junk science:
Fake answers,
stated with
great confidence,
are repeated every year
for over three decades
... to climate questions
whose correct
( real science )
answers are unknown.
Question (1):
Is the mild
global warming
since 1880
(roughly + 1 degree C.)
mostly
human-caused?
Correct Real Science Answer:
-- Very unlikely before 1950.
-- Unknown after 1950.
The global warming
after 1950,
mainly from 1975 to 2003,
is very similar to
natural global warming
before 1950,
mainly from 1910 to 1940.
There's no logical reason
to claim the pre-1950 warming
had a completely different cause
than the post-1950 warming.
Question (2)
Do the
climate models
climate models
we use
accurately predict
climate change?
Correct Real Science Answer:
The methodology
for climate forecasting
shifted from surveys
of experts’ opinions,
to the use of
computer models,
in the past
three decades.
A model is just
a formal statement
of how the modeler believes
climate change works
... which no one
actually knows!
Climate models
are mathematical
expressions
of expert opinions.
Presenting opinions
in mathematical terms,
rather than using words,
does not improve
forecast accuracy.
The average
temperature
of our planet
since 2003
has barely changed,
something that was
never predicted by
any IPCC
climate models.
The average
temperature
of Antarctica
since the 1960s
has barely changed,
something that was
never predicted by
any IPCC
climate models.
Climate models
have predicted
double to triple
of the actual
global warming
in the past
30 years.
That's too far
from reality
for us to trust
ANY climate
model predictions
of the future climate
that are made today.