The claims of a
“scientific consensus”
about global warming
are a myth.
When you hear
the "97%" myth,
that false number
will be based on
a biased "survey",
or abstract-counting
exercise, that starts
with a "97%"conclusion,
and then does anything
required to support
that number.
Honesty and fairness
are not principles
that guide leftist surveys!
A group of Canadian retired Earth
and atmospheric scientists, called
themselves "Friends of Science".
They produced
a 2014 report
that reviewed
four popular
climate change
surveys and abstract
-counting exercises
that I will summarize
in the next four articles.
Friends of Science claim
honest conclusions, based
on all the data received,
without selective editing,
would have been:
(A)
Oreskes actually found
only 1.2% agreement,
(B)
Doran and Zimmerman
actually found
only 3.4% agreement,
(C)
Anderegg et al.
actually found
66% agreement, and
(D)
Cook et al.
actually found
only 0.54% agreement.
There is no 97%, 98%
or 100% consensus
on human-caused
global warming,
as claimed in these
four fake studies.
Modern climate "science"
was the original fake news.
It consists of 100% wrong
wild guess predictions
of the future climate.
These predictions started
with Roger Revelle
in the late 1950s.
The leftist-biased
mainstream press
consistently ignoring
how inaccurate the
predictions have been.
It should be no surprise
the fake news
is supported by
fake consensus
"studies".
(Not that real science
is based on a popular vote
of scientists).
In the history of science,
a "consensus" was strong
evidence that the underlying
science was wrong --
-- ranging from slightly wrong,
to completely wrong.
Progress in real science
is almost always
from individuals,
or small teams,
that prove the
scientific consensus
was wrong,
often after years
of facing
character attacks!
Following are four articles
summarizing the four most
popular fake surveys.
The surveys are used to
support "modern" climate science,
led by government bureaucrats
claiming a coming climate catastrophe
to ensure their own job security:
(1)
Predict a climate crisis
every year.
(2)
Reason given:
"Because we have
science degrees,
and we say so ! "
(3)
Claim you must be right,
because almost everyone
you know agrees with you !
(4)
Claim that 97%
of scientists agree,
so the science
must be "settled".