Global Warmunists Tell Us Scary Climate Fairy Tales, since the 1950's, and then Ignore all contradictory climate data !

The coming global warming 

catastrophe is a leftist fairy tale, 

first told in the late 1950s.

It is used to scare 

the general public,

and create a ( false ) excuse

for more government 

regulations and power

( "to save the Earth" ).

Leftists always want 

more government power.

They hire bureaucrats

with science degrees 

who will make 

scary predictions 

of the future climate.

The mainstream media

publishes every scary

climate article and "study", 

without any skepticism.

Meanwhile, the climate

keeps getting better,

and no bad news shows up !

The mainstream media 

won't tell the general public 

the average global temperature

has only increased +0.15 degree C.

since the peak in 1980, per 

weather satellite measurements.

They won't even tell the public

that weather satellites exist !

The media also won't tell the public 

there was no warming at all from

the 2003 peak, to the end of 2018.

.

.

.

.

An amazing quantity of

climate facts and data 

are ignored by anti-science

climate change cult members,

simply because they weaken 

or contradict, their 

near-religious belief 

in a coming global warming 

catastrophe, that we've been

waiting for since the late 1950s !

But no climate bad news

ever shows up !

.

.

.

Here is what the

"global warmunists"

deliberately ignore:

.

.
(1)
They ignore climate history, 

which includes hundreds of

long term cooling / warming 

cycles over the past 800,000 years, 

as determined by ice cores and

other climate proxy studies,

so they can falsely claim 

the warming trend since 1850 

is unique.

.

.
.
(2)
They ignore the natural

warming trend that has 

caused glaciers over 

Chicago and Detroit to melt, 

helping raise the sea level 

by over 400 feet after the 

last peak glaciation,

about 20,000 years ago 

because natural warming

can't be blamed on humans!
.

.

.
(3)
They ignore the fact 

that compilations of local 

temperature measurements,

used to estimate a global average, 

began DURING a long-term 

warming trend (after 1850),

and then get hysterical 

every time a new temperature 

record is reached, even though 

that's been happening since 1850,

and will continue to happen,

until the next cooling trend starts !
.

.

.
(4)
They ignore the fact that thermometers 

have a poor global distribution,

with very few Southern Hemisphere

thermometers before 1900, 

and too few until after World War II.

.

.

.

(5) 

They ignore the fact 

that a majority of 

"temperatures" included

in the average temperature 

of Earth's surface,

are only wild guesses,

officially called "infilling", 

done because there are 

no weather stations, or

missing data, in a majority 

of the surface area grids 

(5 degree longitude by 5 degree latitude).

.

.

.

(6)

They ignore the fact that 1800's

thermometers tended to read low, 

when checked against accurate 

modern thermometers, so the 

starting point for most global 

warming claims, in 1880, 

has most likely exaggerated 

the warming since then.
.

.

.
(7)
They ignore an early 1900’s 

change in sea temperature 

measurement methodology, 

from wood to canvas buckets 

-- a methodology change

that coincided with a lot of 

“global warming” at the time.

.
The sea temperature measurement 

methodology was later changed 

two more times !

.

.
.
(8)
They ignore the abandonment 

of most rural USSR weather 

stations in the late 1980’s, 

after the USSR collapsed ... 

The rural measurements 

had been biased 

by government officlals, 

who routinely claimed the

temperatures were colder 

than reality, done to get 

larger allocations of heating oil 

and coal, during the cold winters.

.

The total number of surface 

measurements included in 

the average global temperature 

has changed a lot over time, 

peaking in the 1960’s.
.
After the USSR collapsed 

in the late 1980's, 

the number of weather stations 

in operation fell by about half, 

in just four years.

.

.

.
(9)
They ignore the fact 

that a majority of land 

weather stations in the US, 

the nation claimed to have the

best weather station network

in the world, are improperly sited

by US standards, with thermometers 

too close to buildings, roads, runways

and parking lots, which absorb

heat during the day, and create 

“global warming” at night, 

when the bricks, concrete 

and asphalt release heat

 ( completely unlike what is

 measured at properly sited 

weather stations, surrounded 

by grass, shrubs, trees, etc. )

.

.
.
(10)
They ignore all weather satellite 

global temperature compilations, 

since 1979, even though satellites

provide near-global data,

with far less infilling (wild guesses), 

which for satellites are only required 

for small areas around both poles.

Weather satellite data,

show LESS warming than

the surface measurements

... Scientists say the 

satellite measurements of the 

troposphere should reflect 

MORE warming than measured 

by the surface thermometers,

because greenhouse warming

takes place in the troposphere,

and the troposphere heats the 

surface with less than 100% 

efficiency !

.

.

.
.
(11)

They ignore a missing 

“signature” of greenhouse gas 

warming in the tropics, 

which would be an increasing 

temperature, moving up 

in altitude from Earth’s surface, 

to roughly six miles up.

.
Weather balloons and 

weather satellites 

consistently measure

NO temperature increase 

correlating with altitude, 

which is good evidence 

that greenhouse gases are 

NOT the primary cause of 

of the minor increase

of the average temperature 

since the late-1800’s.

.

.

.

.

.

(12)
They ignore the fact that 

“average temperature” 

is not a real measurement 

of something that exists.
.
Average temperature is a

complex statistical average 

of ever-changing 

local temperatures.
.
There is no single 

global temperature.
.
And statistical averages 

are not real measurements.
.
There is no proof that an average

of local surface temperatures, 

is a meaningful and useful statistic,

considering the data are from

weather stations whose count, 

locations and instruments 

changed radically over time 

... and a majority of "grids" 

in the surface global average 

still have wild guess "infilling",

because there are no thermometers !

.

.

.
(lucky 13) 

The not very smart global warmunists

ignore the very important fact 

that no human can predict the future, 

whether the future climate, 

or future anything else!