The same people who say "The science is settled" ... have made very wrong predictions of the future climate for over 30 years !

There is very little debate 

about climate change.

One side has been predicting
a coming climate crisis
since the late 1950's,
and using compputer models
to make similar predictions
in the past 30 years.

They falsely insist 

the “science is settled.” 

To "prove" that claim, 

they designed
complex computer

climate models 
many decades ago

to make specific 
predictions of
the future climate.

But their computer
model predictions 

are always wrong !

Very far from reality.

The average computer model

predicted triple the warming

that actually happened.

I call them computer games !

With over 60 years 

of wrong climate

change predictions,
and over 30 years 
of wrong climate
model predictions,

how can the science 

be settled ?

There's no scientific proof 

increased CO2 will result 

in disaster.

CO2 has been higher 

during most of the 

history of life on Earth,

than it is today (410 ppm). 

There's no scientific proof 

increased CO2 will cause 

any problem.

If you want to worry,
then worry about 
CO2 levels sinking lower.

There was a 
gradual 97%+ 
loss of CO2 from 

the atmosphere,

starting 550 million 
years ago, with 
CO2 at about 7,000ppm, 

to the lowest level 

of CO2, at about 200ppm
during the peak cold

of the last glaciation,

about 20,000 years ago.

The present Holocene 

interglacial warm period 

has already endured longer 

than some previous 

interglacial periods. 

The beginning of the 

next glaciation may be 

a relatively short time 

from now. 

In fact, there's a 

strong argument 

that the Earth 

is already in 

a cooling trend, 

that started 

10,000 years ago, 

after the glaciers 

that covered 

most of Canada 

had melted.

The peak temperature 

in this Holocene 

interglacial period 

was during the 

Holocene Optimum 

between 8,000 and 

10,000 years ago. 

The Little Ice Age, 

which was coldest 

about 300 years ago, 

was probably 

the coldest period 

of climate since the 

Holocene Optimum.

A somewhat warmer world, 

with a higher level of CO2 

in the atmosphere, 

would result in 

a greener world, 

with more plant biomass, 

higher yields of food crops 

and trees, and a milder climate 

in northern latitudes.

That would be good news,

not an "existential threat".

CO2 is essential for life.

Many people don't
know that and believe

a global warming crisis 

is already in progress.

But the “pause” 

in global warming,

since 2003, 

contradicts 

their belief that 

higher CO2 levels

must lead to higher 

temperatures.

The optimum CO2 level 

for plant growth 

is above 1,000 ppm.

CO2 has been 

above 1,000 ppm 

for most of the 

history of life, 

so what sense 

does it make 

to call for 

a reduction in 

the CO2 level,
from the 
current 410ppm,

with absolutely

no evidence

of catastrophic 

climate change
caused by CO2 ?