Total Pageviews

Saturday, March 16, 2019

Thank you for 31,000 page views


This is a real climate science blog.

Not a "Climate Change" blog.



Real science examines
past climate change,
and tries to explain
what causes climate change.

There are many unknowns !

The future climate is unknown.

Real science is non-fiction.




"Climate Change" is different.

"Climate Change" makes 
wrong wild guess predictions
of the future climate, 
while claiming to know 
everything about the future climate !

"Climate Change" is fiction !




A typical real science
observation is that 
95% of Canada was 
covered with a 
thick ice glacier 
20,000 years ago.

The glacier melted,
most likely in 
10,000 years.

Not from carbon dioxide.




There were also several 
centuries with quite 
a few unusually cold
periods, called the
Little Ice Age.

The coldest period,
was during the 
Maunder Minimum,
with low solar activity,
in the late 1600s.

In the 300+ years since 
then, there was warming, 
of at least +2 degrees C.

That warming was
100% good news.

In fact, all global warming
in the past 20,000 years 
has been 100% good news.




"Climate Change" 
ignores the past climate.

The "Climate Change" cult
would have you believe 
that Earth's climate
never changed for 
thousands of years, 
until the mild warming 
after 1975 !

"Climate Change" 
does not look at 
anything real --
it consists of only 
wrong wild guesses
of the future climate.

And the future 
climate is always 
predicted to be 
100% bad news,
the opposite of past 
climate change !

They try to scare people,
who only hear their 
climate 'conclusions'.

Many people believe 
the predictions because people
making the predictions are
government bureaucrats,
who leftists automatically
trust, and they often have 
advanced science degrees.

The bureaucrats 
sound very confident 
in their predictions !

The people who believe 
scary climate predictions
don't realize that scary 
predictions of a coming 
climate crisis, started in 
the late 1950s, coming from 
Al Gore's favorite scientist: 
Roger Revelle.

That means we've been 
hearing predictions of 
a coming climate crisis 
for over 60 years !

You'd think by now 
the believers would start 
questioning the quality
of the predictions they 
believe ?

Waiting over 60 years 
for a climate crisis 
is a long time to wait !



What actually happened 
in those 60+ years ?

Since humans started
adding lots of CO2 to the air,
after the Great Depression, 
the average temperature 
went down from 1940 to 1975,
then increased intermittently, 
averaging +0.1 degrees C.
of global warming per decade.

( And maybe 
that +0.1 trend 
will continue in the 
next 10 years
... although there 
was actually
no global warming 
from 2003 to the 
end of 2018, per 
weather satellites. )

That mild, harmless 
global warming was
mainly happening 
at higher latitudes, 
during the coldest 
six months 
of the year, 
and at night.

Beneficial global warming !

People living in Alaska 
loved it !





Based on real science,
the CO2 level does not 
control the climate.

The only known 
simultaneous 
positive correlation of 
CO2 atmospheric levels,
and average temperature, 
in the 4.5 billion years 
of Earth's history, 
was in the short period 
from 1975 to 2003 -- 
only 28 years. 





Based on real science,
lab experiments show,
CO2 may cause mild 
global warming in the
troposphere, that later 
warms Earth's surface.

There's no scientific proof
this has actually happened,
because natural climate 
change can cause the 
same amount of warming
( remember that 
natural climate change 
melted the glaciers 
covering Canada! ) 





A worst case estimate
of the potential warming 
effect of CO2 is easy
to calculate, and reveals 
mild, harmless warming:

The global warming after 1975
can be assumed to be caused
ONLY by the rise of man made 
CO2 emissions after 1975.
( Note: There's no proof
ANY of that warming was 
caused by man made CO2) .

The rate of warming 
after 1975,
if 100% attributed to CO2,
suggests that CO2 could,
at worst, cause only
+ 1 degree C. of warming 
per a doubling 
of the CO2 level 
in the atmosphere.

A doubling of 
atmospheric CO2
would take 200 years, 
if CO2 levels continued 
rising at +2ppm per year,
or 133 years, if CO2 levels
rose +3ppm per year.

The lab experiments
( infrared spectroscopy )
also suggest the 
greenhouse gas effect 
of CO2 in the atmosphere
would be mild.

There is no evidence CO2
could cause anything but
mild, harmless warming,
and actual global
warming since 1975
was mainly beneficial 
warmer winter nights
at high latitudes
( colder areas ). 

To make CO2 warming seem
scary, believers invented a 
new theory of water vapor
positive feedback, 
back in the 1970's,
that would 
allegedly triple 
the warming effect 
of CO2 alone.

There's no proof that theory
is correct, and much evidence 
it is a fairy tale -- the 30 years
of very wrong climate model 
predictions are evidence:
 The average computer 
model predicted
triple the global warming 
that actually happened !

But never mind decades
of wrong predictions -- 
the "Climate Change" cult
never changed their 
1970's theory, and continues
using it in their ( wrong )
climate model predictions !





Based on real science,
adding CO2 to the air
is actually very beneficial 
for our planet,
for the same reason that
greenhouse owners use
CO2 enrichment systems
to add more CO2 to the air
inside their greenhouses !





Calling "climate change"
an "existential threat"
is the mark of a real
climate science denier !

Past climate change
was 100% beneficial, and 
future climate change
is not even a minor threat !

People who believe
"existential threat".
should be forced 
to wear green T-shirts
that say: 
 "I'm a stupid
real climate 
science denier" ! 



The leftists' hysteria 
over climate change, 
is why I write this 
climate science blog,
as a public service.

I summarize real science
articles and studies 
that I've been reading 
as a hobby since 1997, 
and once in a while 
I insult power-hungry,
lying leftists too  !

I despise being lied to 
about an imaginary 
coming climate crisis,
by devious leftists,
whose actual goal is to
micro-manage the world.


Richard Greene,
since 1953

Audiophile,
since 1965

Libertarian, 
since 1973

BS, 
State University of New York, 
at Albany, 1975

MBA, 
Stern School of Business,
at New York University, 1977

Editor of an
economics 
newsletter,
since 1977

Married to 
wonderful wife,
since 1983

Living in 
Bingham Farms, 
Michigan,
since 1987

Retired, lazy bum, 
since January 2005

Editor of the 
Economic Logic Blog,
since 2008

Editor of this
Honest Global
Warming Chart Blog,
since 2014

Editor of the 
Election Circus
politics blog,
since 2016 

Disappointed 
that global warming
appears to have 
skipped Michigan !

Does not speak French.

And author of bad jokes.