NASA-GISS is altering
their historical
"unadjusted data",
to create more
global warming
out of thin air.
Use of the term "adjusted data"
is a trick to disguise the fact
that what they are talking about
is really their interpretation
of “raw unadjusted data".
But "raw data" are
being "adjusted" too !
This is known as
"temperature
homogenization".
It has become a global "standard",
among climate monitoring groups,
to ensure the historical temperature
data record more closely matches
their 'precious' climate models.
Reason:
"Truth" is not a leftist value !
Some climate skeptics who carefully
save old versions of raw data,
noticed that scientists at NASA-GISS
have been altering "raw" temperature data
to show more warming, probably so
their further "adjustments" to the
"raw data", creating additional warming,
don't look so suspicious.
A Reykyavik, Iceland example
is shown in the chart below:
A Hachijojima, Japan example
is shown in the chart below:
Activist scientists at NASA GISS
are rewriting climate history !
They’ve done this
on a global scale,
cooling past
temperatures
with "adjustments"
they have been
making since 1987
so that between one-quarter,
and one half, of the claimed
+1 degree C. warming
since 1880, is from "adjustments"
to raw temperature data.
If these government bureaucrats
had a reputation for honesty,
I'd assume their "adjustments"
were done for good reasons.
But they are far from being honest,
as clearly demonstrated in hacked
2009 and 2011 "ClimateGate"
eMails !
Comparing NOAA's v1 to v4,
of the global average temperature,
shows a large cooling of the past,
when you compare the same
temperature stations in the
different versions.
The latest v4 has the coolest past.
"Cooling the past" increases
the amount of global warming,
when you don't cool the
current temperature too .
"Scientists" discussed cooling
the early 20th century, in the
hacked ClimateGate" eMails,
saying “correcting” it would be
“good” for the cause.
After the 1970s, they removed
roughly 4,500 of 5,500
temperature stations
that had been contributing to the
worldwide database, and most
of the stations removed were
located in colder, rural areas.
Since 2008, NASA added +0.24°C
to the 1900-2000 warming trend,
mostly by cooling the past
to create a steeper rise of
global warming.
In 2010, NASA decided that they
needed to “correct” a cooling trend
in the oceans by changing the data.
In 2015, NASA added a small amount
of warming to the oceans to turn the
1998 to 2015 global warming "pause"
into a slight warming trend.
NASA’s GISSTEMP puts out a
Land Ocean Temperature Index (LOTI)
on a monthly basis and about
25% of the monthly entries
are rewritten.
NASA does not archive the monthly
LOTI releases, and only a fraction of them
are available on the Internet Archives
WayBack Machine, but it is reasonable
to conclude that since 1997 nearly
100,000 changes have been made
to the data !
These changes go on every month.
In 2016, a letter from 300 scientists
asked Congress: "to assure that the
Data Quality Act is complied with,
which NOAA has not done
regarding both the U.S. and global
empirical temperature observations.”
Many "adjustments" have been made
multiple times to the same historical data.
"Adjustments" to the same data
are ongoing, meaning something
is seriously wrong with the "science".
If there was anything left of ethics
among the government bureaucrat
"climate scientists", they would always
show both the raw data and their
interpretations of it, with a detailed
scientific explanation for their
interpretation of the raw data.
This won't work if "raw data"
are "adjusted" too !
“Trust us” is not real science !