Total Pageviews

Tuesday, May 28, 2019

Climate Alarmists Want an "Energy Revolution" -- They Are Deluded -- Won't Get It In Our Lifetimes

The idea that “old” hydrocarbon 
technologies are about to be 
displaced by clean-tech energy 
is a fantasy, like the Trump
Russian Collusion Delusion !

As Bill Gates has put it, 
the challenge calls for 
scientific “miracles.” 

As usual, leftists think the 
"answer" is more government 
regulations, and subsidies.

Based on their 
convoluted "logic", 
and lack of knowledge 
about history:

-- Subsidizing railroads
would have resulted 
in automobiles.

-- Subsidizing vacuum tubes, 
would have resulted
in transistors.

-- Subsidizing dial-up phones,
would have resulted 
in the internet.




There has already been 
an "energy revolution" 
in the US:

Over the past decade, 
U.S. production of oil 
and natural gas increased 
by 2,000% more than the 
combined growth of 
( subsidized ) wind and solar. 

Shale technology and horizontal 
drilling have transformed 
the US energy industry.



LEFTISTS  CONFUSE
THE  VIRTUAL  WORLD
WITH  THE  REAL  WORLD
Today’s smart phones 
are cheaper and more powerful 
than a room-size IBM 
mainframe computer from 1980. 

Engineers collapsed 
the energy appetite 
of transistors and 
their size 
-- computing power 
per energy unit 
doubled five times 
per decade. 

A single iPhone 
at 1980 energy efficiency, 
would require as much power 
as a Manhattan office building. 

A single data center 
at 1980 energy efficiency, 
would require as much power 
as the entire U.S. electric grid. 

Thanks to efficiency gains, 
the world today has billions 
of smart phones, and thousands 
of data centers.

A similar transformation 
in how energy is produced 
is impossible. 

Computers are logic engines 
that don’t produce physical action 
or energy; they manipulate 
the numbers one and zero:
-- a binary switch—on or off.

But the energy needed 
to move people, heat steel,
or grow food is determined  
by laws of gravity, inertia, 
friction, and thermodynamics.




Differences between 
the physical world and
the virtual world are huge.

In the virtual world, information
can be “compressed” to reduce 
the energy needed to transport 
that information. 

Humans and other 
objects with mass
can't be “compressed”.




WISHFUL  THINKING 
ABOUT  RENEWABLES
Throughout history, 
between 50% to 90%
of every nation’s economy 
has been consumed 
by food and fuel costs. 

Coal, oil, and natural gas
drove down the share of GDP 
devoted to food and fuel,
to around 10%.

Climate activists claim 
“clean energy” 
from wind turbines, 
solar arrays, and batteries, 
is about to become 
incredibly cheap, creating 
“new energy economy.” 

Over three out of four 
Americans believe the US 
is “capable of creating 
a new electricity system.”  

The International 
Monetary Fund 
recently said, 
“Smartphone substitution 
seemed no more imminent 
in the early 2000s 
than large-scale 
energy substitution 
seems today.”

Meanwhile, wind and solar
supply just 2% of 
global energy, despite 
hundreds of billions 
of dollars in subsidies.





REAL  PHYSICS  VERSUS
THE  LEFTIST  FANTASY 
OF RENEWABLE  ENERGY:
Spending $1 million 
on wind or solar 
hardware will yield about 
50 million kilowatt-hours 
of electricity over 
a 30-year period. 

The same money spent 
on a shale well yields enough 
natural gas over 30 years 
to produce 300 million 
kilowatt-hours 
-- six times as much ! 

Subsidies can’t change 
the huge difference 
in the energy densities
of hydrocarbons ( high ) 
vs. solar and wind ( low ). 

Batteries are promoted, 
as the way to convert 
wind or solar into useable 
on-demand power. 

Rather than thinking about 
the impossible goal of 
battery backup 
for a whole nation.
let's think about storing energy 
for a cargo ship or airplane.

The maximum potential 
energy contained in 
hydrocarbon molecules 
is about 1,500% greater, 
pound for pound, than the 
maximum theoretical 
lithium chemistries. 

That’s why the cost 
to store a unit of energy 
in a battery, is 200 times more 
expensive than storing 
the same amount of energy, 
in the form of natural gas. 

Today it would take 
$60 million of Tesla batteries—
weighing five times as much 
as the entire airplane
—to hold the same energy 
normally held in a transatlantic 
plane’s onboard fuel tanks.

Florida Power & Light 
recently announced 
a plan to replace 
an old gas-fired 
power station 
with the world’s 
biggest battery 
project.

It's promised to be 
four times bigger 
than the current largest
battery system Tesla installed
last year in South Australia. 

The monster battery “farm” 
will be able to store just 
two minutes of Florida’s 
electricity needs. 

What a waste of money !

It also takes a huge amount
of energy to manufacture 
batteries !

It takes the energy equivalent 
of about 100 barrels of oil 
to manufacture a battery 
that can store the energy 
in one barrel of oil. 

Batteries manufactured in China 
( most are) are being made with 
electricity from a predominantly 
coal-powered grid, resulting in more 
carbon-dioxide emissions 
than those batteries, coupled 
with wind/solar, can eliminate. 

Wind turbines, solar cells, 
and batteries will get better.

So will drilling rigs and 
combustion engines.