Total Pageviews

Tuesday, July 30, 2019

Powering An Electrical Grid With 100% Intermittent Renewables is Impossible

Intermittent renewable energy 
sources, like wind and solar, 
bring customers large 
electricity price increases.

The cost of batteries sufficient 
to power a city of millions 
of people would be the primary 
cost of the whole system. 

An electrical grid must operate 
with 100% reliability every minute
of the year.

A reliable grid requires 
a very close match 
between power supplied, 
and power demanded, 
on a minute-by-minute, 
and even fraction 
of a second, basis.

Wind and solar sources 
experience large, 
unpredictable, 
and often sudden swings 
in the power they supply.  

There will be calm nights
when no wind or solar
energy is available.

So nearly all pre-existing 
fossil fuel capacity 
must be maintained
as solar and wind back-up.

No amount of excess capacity 
can make a wind/solar system 
generate any electricity 
on a completely calm night. 

As wind/solar capacity goes to 
100% , or more, of peak usage, 
the capital cost of the system 
goes to double or even triple
a fossil-fuel-only system.  

The percentage 
of maximum electricity 
capacity when using renewables 
will only average around 30%.

The decrease 
of carbon emissions 
from the backup 
fossil fuel plants 
will be much less than 100%,
since they must often be 
kept on “spinning reserve” 
to be ready to step in 
when the wind and sun die.





In California, both the wind 
and the sun produce a lot more
power in the summer and fall 
than in the winter and spring. 

So, to have a 100% 
wind / solar system 
in California, you'd need 
batteries to store power 
from April to October, 
to be discharged from 
November to March.  

The total amount 
of storage needed
 -- 25,000 GWh for a year, 
is equal to more than 
a full month’s current 
rate of usage.  

The batteries would cost
$5 trillion, which is more 
than the annual GDP 
of California.  

And the batteries 
won't last forever.




Germany leads Europe 
in power generation 
per capita 
from renewables 
-- 30% wind and solar.

The cost of energy in Germany
is about 30 cents per kWh.,
triple the cost of electricity,
in the US.




California is a US “leader” 
in wind and solar energy 
sources. 

According to the California 
Energy Commission, 
in 2016, California got 8.11% 
of its electricity supply 
from solar energy,
and 9.06% from wind,
for a total of 17.17% 
from those two sources.

According to the U.S. Energy 
Information Agency, California’s 
average electricity price that year
was 14.91 cents per kWh, 
50% higher than the U.S. average 
of 10.10 cents per kWh.