Total Pageviews

Monday, August 19, 2019

del Toro et al. (2019) -- Elevated Temperature and CO2 Reduce Potato Virus Y Transmission Rates

del Toro, F.J., Choi, K.S., 
Rakhshandehroo, F., Aguilar, E., 
Tenllado, F. and Canto, T. 

2019

Ambient conditions of 
elevated temperature 
and CO2 levels are 
detrimental to the 
probabilities of transmission 
by insects of a Potato Virus 
Y isolate and to its stimulated 
prevalence in the environment

Virology 530: 1-10


NOTE:
Plant viruses cause 
extensive damage 
to crops every year. 

Most such viruses 
are transmitted via insects, 
who feed on infected plants 
and then pass viruses 
on to uninfected ones. 



SUMMARY:
del Toro et al. (2019) recently 
examined the probability 
of transmission of potato virus Y 
by the peach aphid (Myzus persicae) 
to Nicotiana benthamiana plants 
subjected to either: 
(1) 
present-day 
temperatures (25°C) 
and atmospheric 
CO2 levels (405 ppm), 
referred to as the 
standard treatment (ST), or 

(2)
future-projected 
temperatures (30°C) 
and CO2 levels (970 ppm), 
referred to as the 
climate change (CC) 
treatment.

The authors conclude that 
"conditions of elevated 
ambient temperature 
and CO2 levels 
decreased probabilities 
of transmission of viral 
infection by aphids," 
which suggests that 
"extended warm episodes 
and permanent elevated 
levels of CO2 associated 
[with] climate change 
could challenge the 
prevalence of infections 
by some populations 
of non-persistently 
transmitted potyviruses." 

When the experimental 
environment included 
3 virus-infected aphids, 
transmission frequencies 
were 88% lower 
in the CC treatment 
(6.3% transmission rate) 
compared to the ST treatment 
(52.5% transmission rate). 

Similar findings were observed 
using fewer (1 or 2) or more (4) 
aphids per recipient plantlet, 
where virus transmission rates 
in the ST treatment were always 
significantly higher than those 
in the CC treatment.

del Toro et al. next sought to 
"calculate transmission probabilities 
from either ST or CC donor [infected] 
leaves for different numbers 
of aphids probing on [uninfected] 
recipient plantlets." 

The resultant probabilities 
are shown in the first chart below. 

The probability of a single aphid 
transmitting the virus 
after feeding on an infected plant 
in the ST treatment is 26% (0.260), 
whereas in the CC treatment 
it is a much lower 2.9% (0.029). 

These probabilities rise 
as more aphids are introduced 
into the equation, such that 
when there are five aphids 
having the potato virus Y 
probing on a plant, 
the probability of virus 
transmission to the 
uninfected plant 
reaches 100% 
in the ST treatment. 

However, 
in the CC treatment, 
100% infection probability 
is not reached until 
the number of 
infected aphid events 
on a given plant 
reaches a whopping 34, 
a value far off the graph!



DETAILS:
The second graph shows 
the average number 
of first-time probings 
by aphids on recipient plants 
after having fed on leaves 
of infected plants 
in the two temperature and 
CO2 treatments that are 
required to contaminate 
the uninfected plant, 
relative to the number 
of aphids that reach 
each recipient plant. 

del Toro et al. determined 
that in the ST treatment 
a visitation rate of 1.10 aphids 
per plant in a week was 
"sufficient to maintain 
potato virus Y 
in a simulated 
environment," 
whereas a visit of 4 aphids 
per plant per week 
was enough to ensure 
maximum transmission/plant 
infection.

 In contrast, the researchers 
determined that 
"the virus disappeared 
from the environment 
when less than 10 aphids (9.881) 
visited each plant in a week" 
in the CC treatment, 
and they note that 
"only with values equal to 
or greater than 10 
visiting aphids/plant/week 
infection became endemic, 
although with percentages 
of infection much lower 
than under ST conditions."