This new study finds that
climate change has a high
positive correlation with
lower sperm counts,
smaller male genitals,
and less interest in sex,
resulting in significantly
lower birth rates
in many nations.
The study, released a few days ago,
made me suspicious, but I can't find
any fault with the science.
The lower sperm counts, and lower
birth rates, are old news.
And I knew of another study,
summarized in the Washington Post,
finding that record numbers of Americans
are not having sex, based on data
compiled by the General Social Survey,
( a survey done by the National Opinion Research Center
at the University of Chicago, since 1972 ).
The portion of Americans age 18 to 29,
reporting no sex in the past year,
more than doubled between 2008
and 2018 !
But "smaller male genitals"
from climate change
is a brand new claim to me,
and one that will get a LOT
of attention from men !
I was wondering how the
measurements were done ?
No one with sense would trust
men to do measurements
themselves ... unless the
scientists later "adjusted"
the numbers to be smaller
( like global temperature
"adjustments", used to make
the 1930's cooler, and cooler,
so in a few more decades,
I expect the "1930s Dust Bowl"
will have been "adjusted"
into the "1930 Snow Bowl" ! )
But seriously now,
never mind the unspecified
measurement methodology,
-- this new claim has
HUGE implications:
A majority of
climate change
skeptics are men.
This claim may cause
male climate change skeptics
to change their minds !
If men think their favorite organs will
shrink from climate change, they are
likely to support the Green New Deal
-- they may not even want to wait
until 2030 for full implementation !
This could significantly weaken
climate change skepticism !
Unfortunately, the math was too
complicated for me to understand,
so I was unable to summarize
the study in simple language.
But I did a "cut and paste" of the study
report, and you should read the relatively
easy to understand Executive Summary,