Total Pageviews

Monday, November 11, 2019

Offshore wind energy is an extremely expensive climate change fantasyland

The International 
Energy Agency (IEA) 
now claims that
“renewable, 
sustainable”
energy output 
will explode 
over the next 
two decades,
especially growth 
of offshore
wind energy.

But offshore wind energy,
in fact, is the worst possible,
most expensive possible,
source of renewable energy.

“Offshore wind currently 
provides just 0.3% of 
global power generation,” 
IEA executive director 
Fatih Birol noted. 

“Wind farms” closer than 
37 miles from coastlines 
around the world, 
where the waters are
less than 60 meters 
              ( 197 feet ) 
deep, could generate 
36,000 terawatt-hours 
( 36 million gigawatt-hours
 or 36 billion megawatt-hours )
of electricity a year, 
Birol claims.

That’s above the current 
global demand of 23,000 
terawatt hours, says Birol, 
and a new IEA report.

IEA predicts in 20 years,
the offshore wind industry 
will be 15 times bigger 
than now, 
and will attract 
$1 trillion a year
in investments.



Massive offshore electricity
"factories", with turbines and 
blades towering 500-700 feet 
above the waves ?

A single 1.8-MW onshore 
wind turbine requires 
over 1,000 tons of steel, 
copper, aluminum, rare earth 
elements, zinc, molybdenum, 
petroleum-based composites, 
reinforced concrete 
and other raw materials. 

A 3-MW version requires 
1,550 tons of these 
non-renewable materials.

Replacing the USA’s current 
electricity generation,
including replacing all 
gas and diesel vehicles with 
with 100% electric vehicles,
would require 14 million 
1.8-MW onshore turbines.

Covering 1.8 billion acres.

Built with 15 billion tons 
of raw materials, coming from 
thousands of new / expanded 
mineral mines worldwide, 

Thousands of fossil 
fuel-powered factories
in various (I assume)
foreign countries would 
have to manufacture 
all this equipment.

Installing and maintaining
36 billion megawatt-hours 
of offshore wind turbines,
in up to 200 feet of water,
many on huge floating 
platforms, that are strong 
enough to support 
600-foot-tall turbines in 
storms and hurricanes.



In fact, offshore 
turbine facilities
actually generate 
much less electricity 
than previously 
claimed ! 

Because every turbine 
catching the wind, 
slows the wind speeds for 
every other nearby turbine.



Seagoing birds will get 
slaughtered and 
left to sink in the ocean,
uncounted, beneath 
the waves. 



There would be thousands
of miles of underwater 
cables bringing electricity 
to onshore transmission lines.

Fixed and floating turbines,
and underseas cables,  
will interfere with surface 
ship traffic, and underwater
submarine and traffic.

Constant vibration will 
disrupt whale and other 
marine mammals’ 
sonar navigation systems. 

And significant 
visual pollution.


Wind turbine
 electricity output
is often 20% 
of capacity, 
or lower.

During the July 2006 
California heat wave,
wind turbines generated 
only 5% of nameplate capacity. 

In Texas, wind capacity factors 
are generally 9% to 12%,
during hot summer months. 

Wind turbine electricity output 
declines by 16% per decade 
of operation onshore.

Even worse offshore, because 
of storms and salt spray. 



Removing obsolete, worn out 
offshore turbines, requires 
huge derrick barges, and 
near-perfect weather. 

Concrete bases and electrical 
cables, must be removed, 
and seabeds returned 
to their original condition, 
as is required today for 
offshore oil and gas 
operations.

Cutting up 300-foot 
(or taller) towers and 
200-foot (or longer) blades, 
from offshore turbines,
and hauling the sections 
to onshore scrap yards, 
is a big deal.

Recycling blades made from 
fiberglass, carbon fibers 
and petroleum resins,
is difficult, maybe impossible,

Burning blades would release
hazardous dust and toxic gases, 
so that would be prohibited.

Dismantling and disposal costs 
would be huge, unless governments
allow companies to abandon
huge wind turbines, as has been
done with smaller turbines 
in Hawaii and California.




People living on the coasts
will fight offshore wind farms
proposd "in their backyards".

People living on the coasts
generally have a lot of money
to fight offshore turbines in court !

A Massachusetts wind project, 
for 170 offshore wind turbines, 
was originally proposed in 2001. 

It’s now down to 130 huge
3.6-MW turbines, but the 
US Interior Department
is still delaying permits, 
pending “further study.” 

Now that the Obama's
bought a huge oceanside 
home in the area, 
it will never happen !