Total Pageviews

Thursday, December 26, 2019

Princeton Physicist William Happer, PhD, Calls Climate Movement a ... “Bizarre Environmental Cult”.

At COP-25,
Princeton physicist
William Happer
spoke on the 
“false pretenses of 
a climate emergency” 
and called the 
climate protection 
movement a 
“bizarre 
environmental 
cult”, 

“absurd” 

     and 

“madness”.


The distinguished 
professor said:
“It’s too bad we are here
on false pretenses, 
wasting our time talking
 about a non-existent 
climate emergency.”


Happer added: 
“I hope 
sooner or later 
enough people 
will recognize 
the phoniness 
of this bizarre 
environmental 
cult and bring it 
to an end.”

Happer warned 
leading politicians 
against viewing 
combatting CO2 
as a religion, and 
cautioned it 
could end up
badly when 
millions of people 
become obsessed 
with a 
single delusion 
and become 
stark-raving mad 
at climate. 

He said there’s been 
“so much brainwashing 
that it’s going to be difficult 
to bring people back to reality.”


The distinguished professor
said the focus needs to be 
on pollution, and not CO2, 
and that solar energy and 
wind energy blight the 
environment and don’t work 
very well.

With only very little 
impact on climate

On the physics 
of CO2 trapping heat, 
Happer presents a CO2 
chart and suggests that 
doubling the CO2 
concentration in the air
will have very little impact 
on climate and that he 
“can guarantee that no one 
who knows anything 
about science can dispute 
this curve. That’s the truth.”


Taking action based 
on the curves that show 
CO2 has little effect, 
Happer says, this is 
“absolute madness.”

The Princeton physicist 
also believes climate models 
greatly exaggerate the warming 
and that the trace gas (CO2)
is in fact beneficial to the planet. 

Today atmospheric 
concentrations ( of CO2 ) 
are extremely low 
compared to previous 
geological times:












The extra CO2 recently added 
into the atmosphere has in fact 
led to a greening of the planet, 
Happer shows.


Happer called the often 
claimed 97% consensus 
among scientists “phony” 
and that science is 
determined by observation, 
“not votes”

“Scientific 
consensus 
is often wrong,” 
Happer showed.

Happer summarized
that CO2’s impact 
has been exaggerated 
“by a factor of 2 to 4”,
 and that overall 
a little extra CO2 
in the atmosphere 
is beneficial 
to vegetation 
and agriculture.

The whole 
CO2 / climate worry 
“is absolutely 
absurd. 
It’s a cult,” 
Happer concluded.