Total Pageviews

Saturday, January 25, 2020

Davos 2020 -- Introduction

'Green' is the 
new buzzword
among leftists.

Everywhere 
you turn today, 
there are only
two hot topics:
(1) Climate Change, and 
(2) Impeaching Trump.

The very generic
impeachment charges
are not even crimes, 
much less "high crimes".

The Democrats
use "the trial" 
as a public forum 
to make up
false charges, 
and events that 
never happened.

No connection
with reality 
seems required,
and 95% of the 
media will never
question the 
fake charges,
and false
statements !

Similarly, 'greens'
used Davos 2020,
an economics forum,
to make up false 
claims about the 
future climate --
events that will 
never happen.

No connection
with the reality
of past climate
change seems
to be required
-- it's going to
be different,
they claim --
and 95% of the 
media will never
question the 
fake climate
predictions.

Scary climate 
predictions started
in the late 1950's,
and ramped up a lot
32 years ago,
in 1988, when the 
UN formed the IPCC.

You'd think 95%
of the media would
report about 
how many decades 
people have been 
hearing the false
scary predictions 
of climate doom ?

They don't.

The current climate 
is wonderful,
and is getting better,
if it keeps warming.

You'll never hear
that truth.


Meanwhile,
Greta "thundering"
Thunberg is a junk 
climate science 
"trained parrot",
and a very angry 
mental case.

She gets an 
unprecedented
amount of attention,
for a teenage high
school dropout !



The 'green' 
economy 
is being touted 
by almost 
everyone now. 

'Green' has 
ramped up 
even more
with Alexandria 
Occasionally
Coherent (AOC) ,
and her 2018 
Green New Deal.

The Green New Deal,
actually stolen from 
the Green Party,
reads like the
latest version 
of the Communist 
Manifesto -- most 
of the proposals,
and most of the costs,
are for social programs, 
with no connection
to energy use, 
or CO2 emissions.



Even heads of 
major Central Banks, 
are talking 'green'.

It started with new 
European Union 
Central Bank 
President 
Christine Lagarde. 
who made the first 
central bank 
pronouncement 
about the need
for "fighting" 
climate change",
through many
Green initiatives, 
fueled by 
monetary policy.






This will require 
tens of trillions 
of dollars in 
new spending 
programs, 
to implement 
the changes 
needed to "fight 
climate change".

After Lagarde, 
we heard from 
Mark Carney, 
head of the 
Bank of England, 
who showed us 
a ridiculous 
map of Florida, 
before and after 
an alleged 9 foot rise 
in global sea levels.

Carney said
because of the 
massive losses
from climate change (?), 
many pension funds 
would go bankrupt (?).

When high school 
dropout, angry 
Greta Thunberg, 
was invited 
to speak at 
United Nations 
in late 2019, 
and also at
Davos, 
Switzerland 
in early 2020, 
then we know 
'going green' 
is now the official 
'leftist global policy'.




Why is there so much 
climate hysteria now,
many skeptics wonder ?

One reason is to attack 
President Trump, which
started in 2015, 
and apparently 
will never end.

Leftists know Trump
can't respond 
to them with real 
climate science,
because he seems
unable, or unwilling,
to learn enough 
about real climate
science to speak 
on the subject,
off the cuff,
for even 
one minute.


The Green New Deal
is much more 
about implementing
socialism /  Marxism
in the United States,
than about a full
conversion to using
"renewable energy".


I'm going to put on 
my Finance MBA hat, 
and guess about
the motives:

The Green 
New Deal 
is an excuse 
for central banks 
to "print" a large 
amount of money 
to deal with the 
next financial crisis. 

Last time they 
"printed" 
lots of money, 
they blamed it 
on the greed 
of Wall Street.

For a couple of years 
we've been hearing 
about MMT,
Modern Monetary Theory )
a fancy pants term 
for central banks 
"printing" money.

Excuses for 
printing money
could be funding 
socialist programs
such as: 
Universal Basic Income, 
Earned Income Tax Credits, 
or the Green New Deal .

The Green 
New Deal, 
allegedly to 
save the planet 
for the children, 
seems like 
the best excuse 
for central banks 
to "print" money.

But ... 
the new money 
would mainly go
to save broke 
governments 
-- unable to 
completely fund
their promises
of pensions and 
health care for 
government retirees,
and "senior citizen 
welfare" programs
for all other retirees.

Note:
"Printing" money
in modern times
is the electronic
creation of new 
purchasing power,
out of thin air,
used by central
banks to buy 
government debt
on the open market.

For the U.S.,
Interest income
coming in from the 
government bonds,
is used to fund 
the expenses
of the central bank, 
and the rest (most) 
of the interest
is returned to 
the government.

Remember that 
the US Federal Reserve 
Bank is owned by member
banks -- the Fed it is NOT 
a government agency.