Richard Lindzen, PhD,
the youngest scientist
elected to NAS,
summarized the
climate change cult:
“What historians
will definitely
wonder about
in future centuries
is how deeply flawed logic,
obscured by shrewd and
unrelenting propaganda,
actually enabled a coalition
of powerful special interests
to convince nearly everyone
in the world that CO2
from human industry
was a dangerous,
planet-destroying toxin.
It will be remembered
as the greatest
mass delusion
in the history of the world-
that CO2, the life of plants,
was considered for a time
to be a deadly poison.”
The mass media’s job
should be to present
an unbiased view
of climate science.
But they present
only one side,
pretending that
the other side
does not exist,
or is corrupt.
A great deal of
temperature data
are available
on the Internet.
Data about past
global temperatures
from measurements
and climate proxies,
such as ice cores
from Antarctica.
Future global
temperatures
are unknown,
of course, but that
does not stop the
wild guessing.
What gets published,
almost entirely,
are predictions of a
future climate disaster.
These predictions
began in the 1950s,
ramped up a lot in
the late 1980s, and
became almost
hysterical in 2018.
Wild, always wrong,
predictions about the
future climate are not
"settled science".
In fact, they are not
real science at all.
For most journalists,
politicians, and even
government bureaucrat
scientists:
The sky is always falling,
due to multiple boogeymen,
such as global warming,
overpopulation, acid rain,
hole in the ozone layer,
GMO foods, famine,
crop erosion, ocean
acidification, sea level
rise, drying great lakes,
flooding great lakes,
dying great lakes, etc.
The only real threat
in the list is famine.
Air pollution in major
Asian cities seems
to be of no interest !
The scary predictions
have always been wrong.
Every one of them !
Many Democrats
are certain that
our planet must
end fossil fuel use
in about 10 years.
They make speeches
and they fly on their
private jets, to their
next campaign stop,
and say the same thing.
I'm talking about all
the major Democrat
candidates for
president in 2020.
A quote from
Bernie Sander’s
2020 campaign
web site is typical:
“The scientific
community
is telling us
in no
uncertain terms
that we have
less than
1 years left
to transform
our energy system
away from fossil fuels
to energy efficiency and
sustainable energy,
if we are going to leave
this planet healthy and
habitable for ourselves,
our children, grandchildren,
and future generations.”
Bernie can say
whatever he believes
in, but there are no data
that even suggest
a coming climate
emergency -- just
wild guess computer
game predictions.
There has been
mild global warming
for the past 325 years,
with no one harmed
-- the warming was
actually good news.
We are told that
global warming
will continue,
but will no longer be
100% good news --
future warming will
be 100% bad news !
There is no logical
explanation of why
that would be true.
Questions
are "answered"
with ridicule
and character
attacks.
Scary forecasts are
still made year after year,
with no analyses of why
the past 60+ years
of climate predictions
have all been wrong,
always over-predicting
global warming by
2x to 3x.
When predictions
are that wrong,
the scientific
assumptions
that support them
are wrong too !
That's real science !
that support them
are wrong too !
That's real science !
With the usual
climate change
junk science,
no one cares
if the climate
predictions
are always
wrong !
no one cares
if the climate
predictions
are always
wrong !