CLIMATE MODELS
Climate models are
personal opinions on
what causes changes
to the global average
temperature ...
The global average
temperature is a statistic,
not a temperature
that anyone lives in.
Real climate models
would make accurate
climate predictions.
Current climate
"models" make
wrong predictions !
That's why I call them
"computer games".
NATURAL CAUSES
OF CLIMATE CHANGE
After 4.5 billion years
of natural causes
of climate change,
some people have
decided that natural
causes no longer apply
to the past 75 years.
No proof of that --
it's just a belief,
and not based
on science,
The claim that
carbon dioxide is the
"climate controller"
is also a belief,
not based
on science.
Carbon dioxide
does acts a a
greenhouse gas
in a laboratory,
using artificially
dried air for
measurements/
CO2's actual
warming effect
in the atmosphere,
which contains
water vapor,
is a guess, not a
measurement.
PERSONAL OPINIONS
OF SCIENTISTS
DISGUISED AS
CLIMATE MODELS
People with advanced
science degrees want
their personal opinions
to seem like real science.
They do that by converting
their opinions into very
complex climate models.
Their primary personal
opinion is that manmade
CO2, from burning
fossil fuels, is the
"climate controller",
and natural causes
of climate change are
too small to matter.
Climate modelers
simply assume that
humans are the cause
of global warming.
So, when calculations
of the global average
temperature show
global warming,
believers
simply assume
that rising CO2 levels
HAD to be the cause,
and no other potential
cause of climate
change matters.
They completely
ignore periods
of global cooling,
that happened
while CO2 levels
increased:
( 1940 to 1975 ).
They completely
ignore periods
when the global
average temperature
barely changed,
while CO2 levels
rose a lot:
( 2003 to mid-2015 ).
They use what is called
circular reasoning:
Conclusions about CO2
are exactly what what
they assumed to be true
about CO2 in the first place !
IPCC SUMMARY REPORT
The most popular
climate alarmist
report -- their bible --
is the IPCC "Summary
for Policymakers".
The last
United Nations
Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate
Change ( IPCC )
summary report
was called AR5.
AR5 included 11
“main drivers of
climate change” .
The IPCC
guesses
how much
each climate driver
( called a “forcing” )
has affected
Earth's climate
since 1750.
10 of the 11
assumed climate
drivers are from
human causes.
The only one
that is natural,
is changes of
solar energy
input ( called
“irradiance” )
and that variable
is assumed
to be so small
it can be ignored.
About 100 major
climate models
are used in
a huge effort
coordinated
by the U.S.
Department
of Energy.
The models assume
almost 100% of climate
change is human caused.
If you believe that
ONLY humans
cause climate change,
it's easy to declare,
with great confidence,
that natural causes
of climate change
don't matter.
That's not real science.
Climate models
start out with
an unproven
belief about CO2,
and their owners
will not debate
that belief.
They'll call you a
"climate denier"
or
"science denier",
if you question
their CO2 belief.
CLIMATE JUNK SCIENCE
Real science
by assumption
does not exist !
But the junk
climate science
we read in the
mass media.
IS based on
assumptions
( beliefs and
feelings )
The climate alarmist
belief is a coming
climate change crisis,
that never shows up !
That imaginary
climate crisis
has been "coming"
since the late 1950's,
according to some
scientists, but it
never shows up !
When predicting
the future climate,
climate scientists
have been consistent,
gaining a reputation
for being wrong
100% of the time !
It's amazing that
anyone is still
listening to the
climate alarmists,
about the "coming"
climate crisis they
have predicted
year after year,
for many dozens
of years.
CLIMATE SCIENTIST
FINANCIAL SELF INTEREST
A coming climate crisis
just happens to provide
climate scientists with
lifetime job security
as government
bureaucrat climate
scientists !
Their computers will predict
exactly what they are
programmed to predict !
Their complex models
create the impression
that the scientists "know"
the effects of CO2
with great precision.
Their refusals to debate
create the impression
that skeptics, especially
those without advanced
science degrees, are not
worthy of any debate.
They claim "the science
is settled" when no science
is ever settled !
To demonstrate their
(false) confidence
that the science is
settled, most scientists
have not changed
their beliefs about CO2
since the 1979 Charney
Report.
They still claim
the CO2 level
increasing by 100%,
will raise the global
average temperature by
+1.5 to +4.5 degrees C.
( + 3.0 degrees average )
That's a huge range
for any estimate !
A worst case
analysis of
the ACTUAL
global warming,
assuming 100%
of the past
global warming
was caused by CO2,
could blame CO2 for
only +1 degree C
of warming for each
100% CO2 rise,
which is lower than
the low range
( +1.5 C. )
used by the smarmy
climate alarmists.
I write "smarmy"
because the
climate alarmists
keep predicting
double to triple
the global warming
that has actually
happened !
Even when we
use a worst case
assumption that ALL
past global warming
was caused by CO2.
WRONG PREDICTIONS,
BUT NO ONE CARES !
Climate modelers
don't seem to care about
their wrong predictions,
aided by the mass media,
who do not even mention
wrong past predictions !
In fact, the latest computer
climate games ( models )
have been increasing the
warming predictions,
moving even further away
from reality.
The imaginary coming
climate change crisis
gets boring, unless fueled
with new "worse than we
previously thought predictions",
so that gullible climate crisis
believers don't lose interest.
The mass media loves
"worse than we previously
thought" predictions too !