a golden oldie from
March 2019,
edited for
faster reading:
Claims of
a “scientific
consensus”
about future
global warming
are a myth.
When you hear
the "97%" myth,
that false number
will be based on
a biased "survey",
or abstract-reading
exercise, that starts
with a "97%"
conclusion,
and then does
anything required
to support
that number.
Honesty and fairness
are not principles
that guide leftist
surveys!
A group of Canadian
retired Earth and
atmospheric scientists,
called themselves
"Friends of Science".
They produced
a 2014 report
that reviewed
four popular
climate change
surveys and abstract
-reading exercises.
Friends of Science claim
honest conclusions,
based on
ALL THE DATA,
without selective editing,
would have been far
from a 97% consensus:
( Not that real science
is based on a popular vote
of scientists ).
(A)
Oreskes
actually found
only 1.2%
agreement,
(B)
Doran and
Zimmerman
actually found
only 3.4%
agreement,
(C)
Anderegg et al.
actually found
66% agreement,
and
(D)
Cook et al.
actually found
only 0.54%
agreement.
There is no 97%, 98%
or 100% consensus
on human-caused
global warming,
as claimed in these
four fake studies.
Modern climate "science"
was the original fake news.
It consists mainly
of 100% wrong
wild guess predictions
of the future climate.
These predictions
started with
Roger Revelle,
in the late 1950s,
Al Gore's hero.
The leftist-biased
mainstream media
consistently ignores
how inaccurate the
climate predictions
have been.