-- Ignoring about 350 peer-reviewed papers published since 2017 contradicting the claim that post-1850s warming has been unusual ... and dozens of articles, in 2019 alone, found nothing alarming or catastrophic about our climatw.
-- Many scientists believe that the peer review process itself is broken. Some describe it as censorship to keep out dissenters. Key figures in the climate alarmist cult arrange to review each other’s work, while shielding their work from review by skeptical scientists.
-- The late IPCC chairman Rajendra Pachauri claimed the IPCC uses only peer-reviewed science. In fact, their 2007 report that got a Nobel Peace Prize cited 5,587 non-peer-reviewed sources such as “press releases, newspaper and magazine clippings, working papers, student theses, discussion papers, and literature published by green advocacy groups.”
-- When the Siberian town of Verkhoyansk touched 100 degrees F. on June 20, 2920, the green propaganda machine went into overdrive. That temperature was less than one degree above the previous record high, set in 1988. They failed to mention the temperature reached 100 degrees F. in Fort Yukon, Alaska on June 27, 1915. And the people in Verkhoyansk woke up to snow on the ground on July 5, 2020 -- you didn't hear about that either.
-- The BBC report about the Antarctic glacier Thwaites melting rapidly failed to mention active volcanoes beneath the glacier are causing the melting.
-- The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration is the official keeper of US temperature records. It was, according to The Wall Street Journal, exempted from the Data Quality Act – the federal law that requires sound science in policymaking.
-- In September 2019, 250 news organizations around the world openly proclaimed a coordinated campaign to convince their readers and viewers of the urgent need for political action to address catastrophic climate change at the UN’s climate summit later that month.