Total Pageviews

Saturday, January 30, 2021

"Astrophysicist Nir Shaviv: “No Reason To Panic ... Warming Not Due To Civilization” "

Source:
https://notrickszone.com/2021/01/30/astrophysicist-nir-shaviv-no-reason-to-panic-gore-is-misleading-warming-not-due-to-civilization/



"A world renowned astrophysicist says the IPCC’s climate warnings cannot be taken seriously and that climate models use tricks to put the blame on CO2.


... Hebrew University astrophysicist, Prof. Nir Shaviv ...  has fallen out of favor among the academic world because he holds a very different view on what drives the earth’s climate.  


... his applications for publications or research funding have regularly receive rejections.

... Bloomberg refused to publish an interview with Shaviv about the causes of climate change. 


... Forbes magazine ... removed its interview on climate change with the Israeli scientist from its site.


... His parents were environmentalists and lived in a solar home designed by his architect mother.


... In Shaviv’s view, man-made CO2 plays only a minor role in climate change and the majority of global warming is due to solar activity and so there is “no reason to panic.”


“Cosmic rays effect climate on time scales ranging from 100s of millions of years, to the 11-year solar cycle,” he writes at his site Science Bits.



... The models ignore solar activity and use tricks to put the blame on CO2. 

 

“The climate models have not passed the reality test,” Shaviv told Weltwoche.



“Governments have invested billions of dollars, euros and formerly Deutschmarks in climate research over 40 years – and now they have no more clarity than when they started their research.” Shaviv says. 


According to Shaviv, one only needs to look at the earth’s history to see that today’s climate change is not unusual. 


The IPCC even mentioned this in its first two reports. “But from 2001 onwards, this reference suddenly disappeared.”

... “Science is not a democracy: ‘Even if one hundred per cent of all scientists hold a certain thesis, one person who has good evidence for the counter-thesis can still be right.'”