Total Pageviews

Saturday, February 6, 2021

Bill Gates' new book on climate change proves why he got our highest honor last year: 2020 Climate Buffoon of the Year

After living with global warming for the past 45 years, we should all know a lot about it. For most people, the mild warming has been pleasant. No one was hurt.  Siberia has warmer winter nights. But the few people living there are not complaining!
 

On the subject of climate change, you have experience, knowledge, and common sense.  Bill Gates is a "CO2 is the devil in the sky" fool, with a closed mind.  A climate change scaremonger, who believes the science is settled.
 
Here we know that science is NEVER settled, and that certainly applies to climate science. Gates believes he can predict the future, and the future climate has to be bad news, unless you buy his book, and do as he says !


Source of quotes below:


"For Gates, the case for net zero is “rock solid”. 

 

The science is settled, and he is convinced that “the only way to avoid disastrous outcomes is to get to zero”. 

 

For readers already convinced of the “climate crisis” and the imperative to go to “net zero” by 2050, this book holds no surprises. 

 

For those more skeptical of popular discussions of climate change, what is most striking is that Gates – among the world’s most celebrated and successful data scientists — is so curiously unaware or indifferent to data that challenge many of the presumptions contained in the book." 

 

Thus, for example, while Gates is aware of the low energy density and intermittency of solar and wind power (when the sun sets and the wind does not blow) and the prohibitive costs of batteries to store electricity at grid-scale, he nonetheless finds it imperative that we have policies “to force an unnaturally speedy transition”. 

 

Net zero “requires the US to build as much wind and solar we can build and find room for”. Indeed, it would seem that Gates’ optimism sees nothing but promise in affordable decarbonization. 

 

... Alas, ‘following the science’ is neither straightforward nor consensual. 

 

The diversity of scientific views on every aspect of climate change which one would have expected Bill Gates to be conversant with are not to be found in this book. 

 

Indeed, he dismisses contrarian arguments as products of “small and politically powerful groups not persuaded by the science”.