There is unlikely to ever be a red team (coming climate crisis skeptics) versus blue team (CO2 is the devil in the sky green dreamers) climate science debate.
Simply because leftists do not debate anything they believe in.
They have never debated the coming climate crisis, even though we've heard wrong predictions of a coming climate crisis every year since Roger Revelle in 1957.
If I am wrong, and there is a read team-blue team "debate", it will only be for show -- an attempt to show "all sides were heard".
A real debate is impossible because real climate science is concerned with reality -- the present and past climate ... while green zealots are only concerned about a future climate, that is completely different, because it only exists in their imaginations.
How can one refute something that has not happened yet ... when the green zealots will say we must act now -- if we delay, the planet is doomed (the old nonsense precautionary principle)?
Apocalyptic beliefs, such as the coming climate crisis, can not be refuted with data and logic, because the beliefs were never created with data and logic in the first place.
Joining a "pretend" red team would be a waste of time.