The "Ph.D." article that follows had the usual too long and complex sentences, that I broke into two or three parts, with spaces.
The article is about yet another failed attack on the satellite temperature measurements, which do not reflect as much warming as surface temperature measurements used for the global average temperature.
A new "study" by climate alarmists claims climate computer models, that have failed to predict the climate for the past 40 years, suggest the UAH satellite temperature data under count actual global warming.
So you should trust the climate computer games(?), not actual measurements made in a very stable environment -- the troposphere -- where the greenhouse effect actually occurs.
The study fails to mention that the most stable radiosonde data sets support the UAH satellite temperature trends, but NOT the surface temperature measurements used by the climate alarmists.
The coming climate crisis is a false claim based entirely on a fake water vapor positive feedback theory, that allegedly triples the warming effect of CO2 alone, assumed (not proven) based on lab spectroscopy experiments.
There is no way to measure the actual effect of CO2 on the global average temperature, because too many variables can affect the climate.
The people who claim to know exactly what CO2 does in the atmosphere, are liars.
The people who claim the water vapor positive feedback theory is correct, with no evidence or proof of that, are climate scaremongers.
Without that positive feedback theory, global warming would be expected to be mild and harmless.
And actual global warming in the past 45 years has been mild and harmless.
Does it really matter what caused the greening of our planet, and moderating of the temperatures, mainly in colder areas?
That actual climate change since the mid-1970s has been good news, not a climate emergency.
A climate emergency is a false vision of the future climate, based on always wrong predictions, staring in 1957, of a coming climate crisis.
Climate computer models predict whatever their owners and programmers want to predict.
Accurate climate predictions do not happen, and are obviously not a goal of the climate computer games.
Scary climate predictions are intended.
Because people who fear the future climate are more easily controlled by devious, power hungry, leftist politicians.
Ye Editor