Climate alarmist's ad hominem comments are not science -- that's true.
But they ARE useful propaganda -- they work for the climate alarmists.
We climate realists should use them too.
Read Saul Alinsky's two books to understand why ridicule works to distract the opposition, puts them on the defensive, and make them seem unworthy of debate (of climate science).
So there is no debate.
The claim of catastrophic climate change (CAGW) is also not real science.
CAGW is hard to disprove because it is always coming in the future, so has not happened yet.
With real climate science, one can discuss the current and past science.
But climate alarmists are not very interested in that.
But predicting the future climate has been a mystery, other than saying it will change.
But that's where climate alarmists come alive -- predicting the future climate.
They claim the future climate can ONLY get worse.
Because they say so.
And they must be right, because they have peer reviewed, published in 'prestigious' science journals, papers, that say so.
When reporting what climate alarmists believe, it sounds like ridicule !
Always wrong wild guesses, predicting a coming climate crisis for 64 years in a row, while the actual climate improves, are not real science.
Unfortunately, you can not win any argument with climate change zealots using science.
Their belief in a coming climate crisis was not based on facts, data and logic, so can not be changed with facts, data and logic.
The coming climate crisis is a secular religion, based on faith.
A secular religion that worships government bureaucrat scientists and government funded scientists, all self-proclaimed climate "experts".
Never mind that these people have spent many decades making wrong climate predictions, and playing climate computer games that "project" double the warming that actually happened.
Every year they proudly declare "the science is settled", and make yet another scary, coming climate crisis prediction.
People with common sense, who point out that the past 45 years of global warming were harmless, at worst, probably beneficial, are character attacked and ridiculed for pointing out climate reality.
The coming climate crisis predictions have nothing to do with real science.
Scary climate and environmental predictions, consistently wrong for over 60 years, are a political strategy.
They are a political strategy to create fear, knowing that fearful people are more easily controlled.
COVID fear is declining, so the fear of a coming climate crisis is ramped up again.
Excuse me, I meant "climate emergency".
Note: Concerning the large fonts and spaces between sentences in my articles: I need them to read what I have typed, due to a serious vision disability, that can not be corrected. Ye Editor