"I lent my underwater camera (Olympus TG-6) to a dear friend who recently visited Lady Elliot Island at the Great Barrier Reef.
She came over last Sunday to return the camera, and to show me some of her photographs.
My favourite is of the Parrot fish just beyond the magenta-coloured corals, shared above.
Over the ledge the water is deeper, and the corals have a blue haze.
This is because wavelengths in the blue part of the visible light spectrum penetrate water to some few metres,
while all the wavelengths in the red part of the spectrum are absorbed by 5 metres under the water.
For those who have never snorkeled or scuba-dived, and who like to lament the dying Great Barrier Reef, the corals beyond the parrot fish in Jessica’s picture might all look bleached.
But that is how corals look in the distance when visibility is good, because the water is so clear.
It is only when you swim up to them, when you are nearer to the corals, that you can see their real colour.
When I see photographs online and in newspapers of corals described as bleached, I often wonder how the photograph was taken – at what depth and whether it was colour corrected.
I wrote to a journalist, Michael Foley from the Sydney Morning Herald, back in April about a picture purportedly showing bleached coral.
Hi Michael
I’m really impressed with your interview with Terry Hughes and particularly how much online media has republished your article ‘Reef on path to destruction and clever science can’t fix it’ and that photograph.
I was curious about the image of the bleached corals.
Where it was taken, and how it was colour adjusted.
I sent an email via the Catlin Seaview Survey contact page, asking for this information last Tuesday (13th April) and to Sara Naylor at UQ.
The email to Sara bounced, Catlin hasn’t replied.
This image was featured in many news reports back in April 2021, republished from a Sydney Morning Herald article with the Catlin Survey credited for the image, but otherwise providing no details.
What I would really like is the original full resolution raw image.
Could you please send me this?
Also, where was the image taken/which reef, and when/which year?
If it was taken back in 2015 or 2016 or 2017 it would be important to know the state of that coral now?
Michael Foley never replied.
There is a wonderful library on Lady Elliot Island, at the resort in a room tucked behind the museum.
I spent some time there most evening when I was on the island for a week back in May.
I found a photograph very similar to the one I queried Michael Foley about.
It is in a book entitled ‘Coral Whisperers’ by Irus Braverman published by the University of California Press in October 2018.
This picture is from the introduction to Irus Braverman’s book ‘Coral Whisperers’
The caption to this photograph provides a lot more information than the Sydney Morning Herald article by Michael Foley published on 8th April this year (2021).
So, the photograph used in the article by Michael Foley was perhaps taken at Heron Island and back in February 2016.
It would seem somewhat disingenuous for a news story published on 8th April 2021 to be accompanied by a photograph from 2016 but without including this important information: that the photograph is five years old.
It would also be useful if the publisher explained that visible light of a blue wavelength penetrates water, while red is absorbed, so corals even just a few metres away can have a blue haze and even appear bleached.
Also, if the Sydney Morning Herald are going to include a photograph from five years ago in a news story, why don’t they also show a more recent photograph – so we have some idea whether the coral is still there, or not?
The Sydney Morning Herald/ Catlin Seaview Survey photograph with the coral changed to beige by my friend Michael who first alerted me to this photograph and how easy it was for him to ‘fix’ what he described as the ‘blue cast’.
Of course, beige is the most common colour of corals at reefs around the world, as I explained in my short documentary film ‘Beige Reef’, that you can watch on YouTube.
Much thanks to Steve Messer for finding a higher resolution image of the ‘bleached corals’ here:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/stopadani/33675818851
Reproducing just a section of this photograph ... it is apparent that the branches are a dark tan in colour with white axial corallites and/or white tentacles extended from the corallites.
This coral is not bleached at all.
A section of the photograph from Flicker and closeup to show that each branch of coral is a brown stem with white corallites and/or white tentacles.
Considering my SST course notes on low visibility and night diving it is apparent that with depth orange/beige begins to look very dark and then eventually black.
So, if we could lift this coral to the surface the stems would perhaps be orange/beige and covered in white corallites with white tentacles extended.
... So, which species of Acropora, or perhaps Anacropora, have the experts mistaken for bleached?"
