Reality: There is no climate crisis and carbon dioxide (CO2) is the gas of life

 Source:

http://www.sepp.org/twtwfiles/2021/TWTW%2010-2-2021.pdf

"All green living things on earth need it to produce food through photosynthesis. and all animal life depends directly, or indirectly, on plant life.

Thus, on this planet, life we generally recognize it depends on CO2.

Without it, the planet would be barren of most life.

Further, as John Tyndall showed in his laboratory experiments starting in 1859, the greenhouse effect prevents the land masses on the planet from going a deep freeze at night, killing all growing plants.

Without carbon dioxide and the greenhouse effect, humans would not be seeking life on other planets, because humanity would not exist.

Decades of laboratory experiments have shown have verified the work of Tyndall and that greenhouse effect of carbon dioxide is self-limiting

in that the effectiveness of CO2 as a greenhouse gas diminishes rapidly with concentrations above 100 parts per million in volume (100 ppm).

It has never been that low.

Below 280 ppm many plants could not survive.

In 1979 the National Research Council issued the famed Charney Report, claiming that the modest warming occurring from CO2, well within natural variation, would be greatly amplified by a greater warming from an increase in water vapor, the dominant greenhouse gas.

The report offered no physical evidence substantiating this speculation.

Yet, the speculation was adopted by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and has remained in its six Assessment Reports.

Since then, space age technology has given researchers the ability to measure what is occurring in the atmosphere in temperature trends, changing greenhouse gases, and changing greenhouse effect.

There is no dangerous warming occurring from changing greenhouse gases.

The UN IPCCC and other claiming dangerous warming, ignore this physical evidence.

Instead, they invent ever more imaginative claims that are not supported by physical evidence to hide their inability show a dangerous atmospheric warming from greenhouse gases.

For those who look beyond the hollow claims of the UN IPCC and its government followers, to include many research institutions in the US, the actual physical evidence is extremely shallow.

Computer models that are not validated with physical evidence are not physical evidence;

increasing urban temperatures are physical evidence of increasing urbanization, not increasing greenhouse effect;

 and the greening of the earth from flourishing plants are physical evidence of increasing carbon dioxide concentrations, not increasing warming from the greenhouse effect.

IPCC’s current Summary for Policymakers of its Sixth Assessment Report, AR6, SPM, 2021, pulled a trick like what it did in the second assessment report

which earned the criticism of the distinguished physicists Frederick Seitz, who was for ten years the director of the National Academy of Sciences.

In the Second Assessment Report (SAR) IPCC inserted, without physical evidence, the hot spot, a pronounced warming of the atmosphere over the tropics which no one has been above to find.

In the SPM of AR6 the IPCC inserted a 2000-year hockey-stick, claiming that since year 1, the temperatures have been roughly stable, then shot up with the industrial revolution, starting about 1850.

The SPM of the Third Assessment Report of the IPCC featured a hockey-stick that started about the year 1,000 AD with an abrupt increase in temperatures starting about 1850.

Statisticians Ross McKitrick and Steve McIntyre destroyed it by showing the methods used produced hockey-sticks from random numbers.

As discussed in the previous several TWTW, statistician Steve McIntyre has traced the history of this hockey-stick to study known as PAGES2k from a group in Bern Switzerland. Little of what is offered as evidence dates back 2000 years, and that which goes back 2000 years does not show a hockey-stick.

Yet many Western governments have embraced these reports in policies to abandon the use of fossil fuels, that will punish their citizens.

Instead of reliable electricity from fossil fuels, these policies embrace unreliable electricity from wind and solar.

Examination for consistent generation show these sources have only one thing that can be reliable – they fail frequently.

Solar fails nightly, and wind fails sporadically, sometimes for days.

Modern civilization and modern manufacturing require reliable electricity 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

Politicians in these Western countries are establishing policies that will destroy modern civilization.

Other pumped hydro-storage there are no means available to store electricity on a utility scale.

And the locations were pumped hydro-storage are successful use reliable nuclear or fossil fuel plants for replenishment."