The coming climate crisis is imaginary -- a belief that dates back over 60 years -- and it not based on science (facts, data and logic), so can not be refuted with facts, data and logic.
The belief is based on claiming to be able to predict the future climate, which is "proven" by consistently wrong, inaccurate predictions.
We have over 60 years of environmental predictions that have been 100% wrong -- no predicted crisis has ever shown up.
To answer the question of what future global warming will be like -- just consider the past 45 years of actual global warming:
Mild, intermittent warming
Harmless warming
Most affected colder, higher latitude Northern Hemisphere areas
Most affected the six coldest months of the year
Most affected nighttime low temperatures.
Greening of our planet from more CO2 in the air
Reality was mild beneficial global warming, and greening, for the past 45 years.
Fantasy is a coming climate crisis ... that has been predicted for the past 64 years, and never shows up.
What do you prefer?
Studying climate reality over the past 45 years?
Or the usual always wrong wild guess predictions of the next 45 years?