Computers "project" whatever the programmers tell them to project. The owners of the program decide what they want to tell the world.
Wrong predictions do not seem to matter -- they are never publicized, and only climate liars claim they are accurate. At least one comments frequently here.
The predictions have not become more accurate over the past 40 years, evidence that accuracy does not matter.
The one climate model that over predicts global warming by the least amount -- the Russian IMN model -- gets no special attention. It's projections are buried within a group of several dozen models that over predict global warming by even more.
An average of climate model predictions is one way to represent the consensus of climate scientists -- the obviously wrong consensus on rapid dangerous global warming --- that we are patiently waiting for.
Climate change is nothing more than 64 consecutive years of always wrong predictions of a coming climate crisis ... that never shows up -- starting with oceanographer Roger Revelle in 1957.
There have always been a few scientists predicting climate doom, but 1957 included Revelle and some other very serious scientists. By "serious", I mean they made no scary predictions to the media, and admitted to being uncertain (that was science in the good old days)..
The coming climate crisis is imagined, not real.
EVERY environmental crisis predicted since the 1960s ...
never happened.
The climate models, that I call "computer games, are designed to supplement the always wrong predictions of climate doom.
40 years of consistently wrong predictions are not real science. Real science requires RIGHT predictions.
And sometimes even they can be a lucky guess.
The best way to refute Climate Liars
is to ignore them, and enjoy your life.
In many nations a little warming has been
good news. The mild, harmless warming
since the mid-1970s was enjoyed here
in Michigan USA, where I live.
We'll take more warming, please !