This blog refutes climate science group think and explains two additional points about climate science:
(1) Governments pay their bureaucrat scientists for scary climate predictions, and get what they pay for, just like cigarette companies once paid scientists to say cigarettes were safe, and
(2) Always wrong predictions of the future climate are not science. Real science requires data. There are no data for the future. There are just unproven theories and speculation. They are data free personal opinions. Beliefs in a coming global warming crisis coming in 10 to 20 years have been predicted ... since 1957. Every prediction of environmental doom since the 1960's has been wrong. 100% wrong.
Climate predictions are nothing more than climate astrology. This is a science blog, so I don't allow those always entertaining wild guess articles predicting the future climate -- because always wrong predictions are not science!
Having a science degree does not mean predictions are science -- warming predictions certainly are not science. I have a science degree -- if I wasted my time making predictions my about the future climate, they would be no better than any other prediction (all are worthless).
... Actually, that's not quite correct: I am the one person on this planet with a correct climate prediction, made in 1997, based on science, that is still correct today: "The climate will get warmer, unless it gets colder." I am still waiting, patiently, for my Nobel Prize.
