Judith Curry is the worst enemy of Climate Realists. She is our worst enemy because she believes CO2 emissions are a serious problem that must be fixed. She never defends that belief -- it is just assumed. She may not consider the problem to be the same emergency as the Climate Howlers do, but it must be fixed. That belief is claptrap.
Curry is called a lukewarmer because she believes the "fix" should not be rushed. That sets off the meaningless debate with Climate Howlers over just how fast the energy transition must be. That debate obscures the real issue -- why should there be an energy transition?
I stopped reading Curry articles this year because she is a lukewarmer who hates CO2, based on her unproven beliefs, while I have supported more CO2 in the atmosphere, based on scientific studies of plants and CO2 enrichment, of which I have read at least 200 studies since 1997.
In plain English, Curry is a real Ph.D. scientist who does not follow science. Her CO2 beliefs similar to the Climate Howlers!
I just read the first line of a Curry article and stopped reading after that. It takes great talent to be WRONG in the first sentence:
"Framework for a robust transition of our energy systems."
Judith Curry
THAT IS WRONG THINKING
No Nation needs a "framework"
No nations need an energy transition
CO2 is not an evil satanic gas -- it is the staff of life on this planet
More CO2 would support more life on this planet
The current electric grids are not broken and do not need to be fixed
After 25 years of studying climate science and energy as a hobby, I came to a new decision this year. I will continue to provide titles and links for the best articles I read on the subject every day, on my blog, with over 373,000 page views so far.
But this year I decided to go after "conservatives" who are hurting the currently failing effort to refute CAGW climate scaremongering. These online comments are exploding my enemies list and thumbs down votes, but I don't care.
We Climate realists are losing this climate change war, and part of the reason is the minority of conservatives who:
Automatically reject 100% of consensus science
Reject AGW
Fail to differentiate between AGW and CAGW
Present unique theories of what causes global warming, with no proof
Blame the sun for climate change, while ignoring no change in Top of the Atmosphere (TOA) incoming solar energy
Reject manmade CO2 as a climate change variable
Claim water vapor is a climate change variable when it is really a feedback
Claim CO2 has no effect above 350ppm
Claim there is no water vapor positive feedback
Claim manmade CO2 accounts for 3% of all CO2 in the atmosphere (it's 1/3)
Cheerlead about electric vehicles, while ignoring their many disadvantages
Most important:
Some conservatives (aka lukewarmers) believe there MUST be an energy transition, just like climate scientist Judith Curry does, but think it should be different, such as going nuclear (in spite of the fact that Climate Howlers will block new nuclear plants, they are way too expensive, and there is no need for an energy transition).
So this year i am going after conservatives who I believe are hurting our justified battle to refute climate alarmism.
If you believe CO2 is evil, then you are my climate change enemy.
If you believe there must be an energy transition, then you are my climate change enemy.
With those false beliefs you ought to join the Climate Howlers, because you are not helping the Climate Realists.