Climate change on Earth
has been normal for 4.5 billion years.
Our planet has cooled, and CO2 levels in the air have declined a lot, in the past 4.5 billion years.
Fortunately, the current climate is the best climate ever for humans (in those 4.5 billion years)!
No one denies climate change.
The smarmy "global warmunists", however, use the term "climate denier" to character attack people.
They attack EVERYONE who does not agree that global warming from carbon dioxide will eventually kill all life on Earth.
You'd have to be pretty clever at propaganda to convince people living in today's wonderful climate, that there was any problem.
Leftist politicians can be pretty clever.
They hired some leftist scientists, and turned them into computer gamers who have been predicting a coming climate catastrophe for the past 30 years.
The leftists in the media parrot the coming catastrophe claims.
The leftists who teach in schools parrot the coming catastrophe claims.
With enough leftists parroting the same false boogeyman -- CO2 is evil -- it's not surprising many people believe their nonsense.
For the past 30 years, some scientists have been getting attention and funding by claiming our current, wonderful climate is actually abnormal -- claiming we're in the early stage of runaway global warming that will eventually end all life on earth.
Runaway warming is complete nonsense, but the warnings do get a lot of attention, and lots of government funding!
There's no money in announcing the truth:
"The current climate is wonderful".
If "modern climate science” was really a “settled science,” their computer climate models would accurately predict the future climate.
The climate computer games have actually overestimated warming by 2x to 3x
-- they're not even close to reality.
-- they're not even close to reality.
The failed computer models focus on CO2, a minor climate change variable, but generally ignore the sun, clouds and water vapor in the air.
Climate computer models that make wrong predictions are not real science -- they are actually worthless, but very expensive, computer games.
Real science reaches a conclusion through data collection and data analysis.
Modern climate "science” is fake science,
that consists of:
(1) Computer games that make wrong predictions,
(2) Peer reviews only by like-minded people, and
(3) Bogus surveys claiming a 97% consensus, when the honest number is about 50%, as if real science is determined by a vote!
Real Science uses the the Scientific Method,
which is completely different than climate "science":
(1) Observation made,
(2) Hypothesis formed,
(3) Experiment designed,
(4) Data collected,
(5) Data analyzed,
(6) Hypothesis accepted, or rejected,
(7) Experiment report written,
(8) Report peer reviewed by skeptical scientists, and
(9) Replication of experiment by skeptical scientists.
In real science the status quo, or consensus,
is called: the “null hypothesis”.
is called: the “null hypothesis”.
Sometimes the consensus is rejected by an experiment, which helps a lot to get the research published.
Other scientists must “replicate” the experiment to validate the findings, but often can't!
Real science is based upon skepticism,
and validated by experiment replication.
Science progresses from "falsification" of a current consensus -- not mindlessly defending a consensus
as "settled science", and character attacking anyone with contrary data who disagrees.
as "settled science", and character attacking anyone with contrary data who disagrees.
The purpose of real science is to falsify a “consensus,” not agree with it.
Modern climate "science”
is left wing politics
is left wing politics
disguised to look like science.
Modern climate (non)science blames warming on CO2, but also blames cooling on CO2.
No matter what the climate does,
and no matter that CO2 levels and temperature
both went up together only 1/3 of the time since 1940,
both went up together only 1/3 of the time since 1940,
the global warmunist conclusion never changes:
-- CO2 is going to cause a climate catastrophe
because we say so!
Falsification of the "CO2 is evil" belief
is impossible with fake science!
is impossible with fake science!
In real science, falsification must be possible,
otherwise what you have is a religion!
otherwise what you have is a religion!
Even when using the Scientific Method,
a huge majority of scientific beliefs
eventually turn out to be wrong,
ranging from slightly wrong,
to completely wrong.
a huge majority of scientific beliefs
eventually turn out to be wrong,
ranging from slightly wrong,
to completely wrong.
Fake science is always wrong
-- the conclusions are nothing more than
personal opinions and wild guesses.
-- the conclusions are nothing more than
personal opinions and wild guesses.
Government policy around the world
is being based on fake science simply because
fake climate science has been used to create an imaginary climate crisis.
is being based on fake science simply because
fake climate science has been used to create an imaginary climate crisis.
Leftist politicians know how to take advantage of a crisis, real or fake, to expand their government power.
And that is exactly what they have been doing for three decades, using the fake coming climate catastrophe crisis to ramp up government power over the private sector.
Note: Fake science used to be called "junk science"
-- I used the term "fake science" to avoid insulting junk!