Total Pageviews

Tuesday, December 26, 2017

The eight "signatures" of climate science fraud

Climate "science",
as practiced by,
government bureaucrat
climate modelers,
is fake science,
which is nothing like,
real science.

Their fake science,
consists mainly of,
wild guess predictions,
of the future climate,
that have been wrong,
for almost 40 years,
so far !

But they don't care,
because the predictions,
are only made to scare people,
into demanding their govt.
do something now,
about the alleged,
coming climate crisis.
(that will never come)

Leftist politicians,
have a long-term goal,
of taking in a lot more
government revenues,
from new taxes,
on corporate energy use !

The leftist scheme is to build,
a bigger and more powerful,
socialist central government,
through phony virtue signaling,
using a clever 'sales promotion', 
that I call: 
   "Save the Earth Socialism".

Politicians use,
the false excuse,
that they need more power,
to save our planet,
for the children ...
... a planet,
that currently has,
a wonderful climate,
and doesn't need saving !

Modern climate "science",
is led by smarmy politicians,
whose involvement,
promotes fake science,
over real science.

The politicians claim,
"the science is settled",
but then hire scientists,
... to do what ? 

Answer: 
To put on a massive, 
good guy (goobermint)
vs. bad guy (corporations)
show for the public !

The climate modelers,
are used as props,
to impress the public.

They waste taxpayers' money,
on supercomputers,
and complex computer models,
that can't predict anything !

But that doesn't matter,
because complex 
climate models,
are props too,
used to impress,
the general public,
in a government-led process,
that mixes together,
the worst elements,
of politics, religion,
junk science, and
the theater !

Adapting a strategy 
used by religious leaders,
throughout history,
the leftist politicians claim,
a coming climate 
catastrophe will end,
all life on Earth,
but only they can stop it --
just do everything they say,
without question !

The "coming catastrophe",
coming since the mid-1970s,
is non-scientific nonsense,
used for personal gain,
both political and financial,
but quite a few leftists,
believe it, probably because,
they are not very bright !




Following are 
eight "signatures",
of science fraud:

[1] 
The Pre-Determined 
"CO2  Conclusion":
The UN's IPCC,
was NOT formed,
to study the science,
of climate change,
but ONLY to defend,
a scary leftist fairy tale, 
that I call:
"The CO2 Conclusion":
( Burning fossil fuels,
emits carbon dioxide,
that will gradually lead to, 
runaway global warming,
ending all life on our planet ! )

The biggest science fraud of all,
is "the CO2 conclusion",
backed by no real science,
yet defended by leftists,
with vicious character attacks,
on all CO2 conclusion skeptics,
from taxpayers concerned about,
govt. policies based on fake science,
to professors with science PhDs,
who recognize the fake science !


[2] 
Temperature  Predictions,
Consistently  Are,  
Very  Inaccurate:
Earth has been warming,
since peak glaciation,
20,000 years ago,
so predicting more warming,
takes no scientific talent,
but the predictions,
consistently call for,
triple the warming ,
that actually happens !

It takes great dishonesty,
to hide way off the mark,
temperature predictions,
from the public,
and never admit,
your climate models, 
that are based on,
"the CO2 conclusion",
have been so wrong, 
for so long !


[3] 
Computer  Model  Output,
Confused  With  Real  Data:
Computer model output,
predicting the future,
average temperature, 
is valued more than,
the much different, 
real temperature measurements.

Real data are arbitrarily,
and repeatedly, "adjusted",
even decades later,
to better match,
the computer predictions !


[4] 
The  Conclusions  
Can't  Be  Falsified:
Average temperature predictions,
for 100 years in the future,  
really can't be,
thoroughly falsified, 
without waiting,
for at least 50 years !

Every unusual weather condition,
is blamed on global warming,
although real greenhouse warming,
should result in milder weather,
by reducing the temperature differential,
between the tropics and the poles  

The computer game predictions,
from the 1980's, 1990's and 2000's,
ended up being far from reality, 
because they were based,
on the (false) CO2 conclusion.

The CO2 conclusion, 
is based on science from 1896,
when Arrhenius hypothesized,
CO2 might warm the climate,
but never proved his hypothesis.

Defining CO2 as a greenhouse gas,
is reasonable, based on,
simple lab experiments, 
where the CO2 warming effect,
is estimated as +1 degree C.,
per doubling of CO2 in the air,
which could take 200 years!

In the year 1979,
the harmless +1 degree C.,
from lab experiments,
was arbitrarily tripled,
using absolutely
no real science,
by inventing out of thin air,
an imaginary theory,
of water vapor positive feedback,
used to claim total warming of,
+3.0 degrees C.,  +/-1.5  degrees,
from a doubling of CO2,
(rather than +1 degree C.)
and the +3.0 degrees,
was then used,
in climate models,
causing them to predict,
triple the actual global warming !
( surprise, surprise! )

That 1979 fake"science",
has never been revised,
and is still used today,
for climate models,
believe it or not,
even after 38 years,
of causing very wrong 
predictions of the,
average temperature !


[5] 
Repeated  Arbitrary 
Data  "Adjustments":
Direct, real-time,
temperature or sea level,
measurements are made,
using the most accurate,
measurement methodology,
but when they don't support,
the prior predictions,
they are arbitrarily ignored,
or changed with "adjustments":

(a) Repeated "adjustments", 
and/or

(b) Real-time data replaced with,
computer model wild guesses, 
and/or

(c) When two or more different,
measurement methodologies,
are available to choose from, 
the one chosen is ALWAYS,
the one that shows,
the most warming,
or the most sea level rise,
and not the methodology,
providing the highest quality data ! 


[6] 
Only  the 
Consensus  Belief 
is  Funded:
Climate "science" is,
almost entirely funded,
by central governments,
and that funding is directed,
almost entirely to “proving”,
the CO2 conclusion,
while almost nothing is spent,
trying to falsify that conclusion,
and/or researching,
the many natural causes,
of climate change.

The tiny amount of research,
funded by private citizens,
and private companies,
is attacked as biased science,
except when the conclusions,
completely agree with,
the government bureaucrat,
climate modelers !  


[7] 
Confirmation  Bias:
No restrictions to prevent,
confirmation bias,
leads to cherry-picking,
the data that appear to support,
the CO2 conclusion,
while ignoring contrary data,
as if they don't exist !

Also, no double-blind activities,
are used to prevent, 
confirmation bias !


[8] 
Conflicts  of  Interest:
No restrictions,
on conflicts of interest,
so it's no surprise,
the same people, 
who make temperature predictions,
also compile temperature actuals,
and calculate the global average,
that will be used to determine,
whether their prior predictions,
had been accurate, or not !