Total Pageviews

Sunday, July 29, 2018

The James Hansen Predictions, 30 years later

It was a record-high 98 degrees 
on June 23, 1988, in Washington DC,
when NASA scientist James Hansen 
testified before the Senate Committee 
on Energy and Natural Resources.

He claimed a “high degree of confidence” 
that carbon dioxide caused global warming,
and was the primary controller 
of the average temperature of our planet.

Hansen had 
an accompanying paper
in the Journal of 
Geophysical Research,
with several 
climate predictions.

What he did was to look 
at the global warming
from 1975 to 1988 
and predicted 
it would continue, 
at a speed related to 
the future growth
of CO2 emissions.

Hansen was predicting 
'more of the same',
which was a safe prediction.

And with three 
different predictions, 
Hansen gave himself
a much better chance 
of being right !



On the 30th anniversary 
of Hansen’s 1988 predictions
let's see what happened.

Note that in 1988 
our planet had been
warming for 20,000 years.

In 1988 Earth was about 
one half degree C. 
warmer than in 1880, 
with an honest margin of error 
larger than the warming itself !

Global average 
surface temperature 
did rise from 1993 to 2003.

But after 2003 
the average temperature
has barely changed, 
except for 
a large El NiƱo heat release 
from the Pacific Ocean
in late 2015 and early 2016, 
which is local warming event
that happens roughly 
every five years,
but is large enough 
to increase the 
global average temperature.

The global warmunists 
love the oceans releasing heat
during an El Nino (aka ENSO) 
because it temporarily raises
the global average temperature.

They never mention 
that El Nino warming
has nothing to do with 
greenhouse gasses,
such as CO2 
-- you don't need 
to know that !




Hansen described 
three scenarios 
for future 
carbon dioxide 
emissions growth
that led to his three 
warming predictions: 

He called Scenario A 
“business as usual,” 
with the CO2 emissions 
growth rate accelerating. 

Scenario A predicted 
+1 degree C. warming 
by 2018. 

Scenario B 
set CO2 emissions 
growth lower, 
increasing 
at the same rate 
as in the 1980s,
and predicted 
+0.7 degree warming 
by 2018.

Scenario C, 
called unlikely, 
had CO2 emissions
stop growing after 2000,
with a prediction
of a few tenths 
of a degree C. 
warming by 2000,
and no warming 
after 2000.



None of Hansen's predictions 
were right.

The Scenario C temperature forecast 
was closest to the actual 
temperature increase.

But the Scenario B CO2 emissions
were closest to the actual 
CO2 emissions growth.



James Hansen 
issued dire warnings 
about CO2 in 1988.

They were not needed.



Computer climate models 
used by the
United Nations 
Intergovernmental Panel 
on Climate Change 
have done even worse
than Mr. Hansen !

On average, 
they predicted 
double to triple 
the actual warming 
since 1988.



In a 2007 court case 
on auto emissions, 
Mr. Hansen claimed 
most of Greenland’s ice 
would soon melt, 
raising sea levels 23 feet 
over 100 years. 

That's not happening
-- not even close.



On the 30th anniversary 
of Mr. Hansen’s testimony,
we now know that
the constant, rapid warming  
he predicted is not happening. 

We had a long period, 
from 2003 to mid-2015,
with almost no warming, 
sometimes called "the pause",
in spite of a lot of CO2 
being added to the atmosphere
... which according to Hansen, 
would have been impossible !