Sunday morning climate rap -- The climate change n-u-t fantasyland

Warming oceans will release CO2
Fossil fuel emissions release CO2

Now let's consider what's important:

(1) How much warming will the next +100 ppm of CO2 cause?

(2) What percentage of the warming since 1950 did CO2 cause?

How has the CO2 increase since 1950 affected plant growth?

What areas had the most warming since 1975?

What months of the year had the most warming since 1975?

What time of day had the most warming since 1975?

We have assumptions for question (1),

with climate change n-u-t-s IMAGINING much faster global average temperature increases than rational people do, based mainly on the mild, harmless ACTUAL global warming in the past 45 years.

 

We have assumptions for question (2), but with so many variables that can affect the global average temperature, we can't blame CO2 for a specific percentage of the warming. 

 

The climate change n-u-t-s will blame all the warning on CO2, as if stating their claim with great confidence automatically creates truth.

We do have answers for the next four questions: CO2 concentrations began ramping up in about 1950, global warming began in about 1975, and that warming most affected areas, and at times, where warming was good news. 

Think of warmer winter nights in Siberia.

The greening of our planet has been measured from satellites, using the Leaf Area Index and NASA Vegetation Index. 

Many thousands of scientific studies show that CO2 enrichment benefits plant growth.

A small percentage did not -- climate change n-u-t-s will cherry pick the few studies that do not support CO2 enrichment, and ignore the others.  

Many greenhouse owners, all over the world, use CO2 enrichment systems to boost growth of their plants. 

Climate change n-u-t-s declare that greenhouse owners obviously don't know anything about growing plants.

Roughly seven billion people have had up to 45 years experience living with global warming.

 

Everyone has had experience living with rising CO2 levels, for every decade of their life.

We don't need to be told what rising CO2 levels do, with some computer game, that make consistently wrong climate predictions.

Because we have actual experience with CO2 rising and mild, harmless global warming.

That's reality.

We also have predictions of a coming climate crisis, that I trace back to oceanographer Roger Revelle in 1957.

Plus about 40 years of a government bureaucrat scientist consensus, as reflected by the average climate model, predicting more than double the actual rate of warming since 1979, when compared with  UAH temperature data.  

That's climate change n-u-t fantasyland.

I prefer to live in reality, not climate change n-u-t fantasyland.