Total Pageviews

Sunday, February 21, 2016

Scientific Forecasting



J. Scott Armstrong is a professor at The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.


He says research on forecasting has been summarized as 140 scientific principles that must followed to make valid and useful forecasts (Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners, edited by J. Scott Armstrong, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001).


Forecasts made by scientists cannot be assumed to be 'scientific forecasts' simply because the people making them have science degrees. 


Philip E. Tetlock (2005), a psychologist and professor at the University of Pennsylvania recruited 288 "experts" on political and economic trends.


Analyzing 82,000 of their forecasts, he found "experts" barely outperformed non-experts.


I've read other studies where "experts" underperformed non-experts.


Most important: When predicting the future, "experts", non-experts, and even village idiots, rarely do better  than flipping a coin!



In 2007, Armstrong and Kesten C. Green of the Ehrenberg-Bass Institute at the University of South Australia conducted a “forecasting audit” of the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (Green and Armstrong, 2007). 



Those forecasting procedures described in sufficient detail to be evaluated violated 72 forecasting principles. 



For example, Green and Armstrong found the IPCC violated “Principle 1.3: Make sure forecasts are independent of politics.” 



Green and Armstrong stated: 
“the IPCC process is directed by non-scientists who have policy objectives and who believe that anthropogenic (manmade) global warming is real and dangerous.”

 

They concluded:

"The forecasts in the (IPCC) Report were not the outcome of scientific procedures.

In effect, they were the opinions of scientists transformed by mathematics and obscured by complex writing. 


Research on forecasting has shown that experts’ predictions are not useful in situations involving uncertainty and complexity. 


We have been unable to identify any scientific forecasts of global warming. 


Claims that the Earth will get warmer have no more credence than saying that it will get colder. "