Total Pageviews

Friday, November 25, 2016

Beliefs and faith versus science

Models developed by leftists all have the same output: "Life on Earth will end as we know it, unless everyone does as we say without question."

The inputs can be on any subject: global cooling, global warming, acid rain, hole in the ozone layer, ocean acidification, exploding silicone breast implants, GMO foods, etc.

Different boogeyman.

Same scary predictions.

Leftists count on the stupidity of the general public to accept their fantasies of doom, and allow their government to seize more power over the private sector, which is always said to be the "only" solution to the coming
(imaginary) catastrophe ... that will never come.

Actually, it doesn't matter if a catastrophe ever comes -- it only matters if enough people BELIEVE a catastrophe is coming.

It's not surprising that so many people will believe scary predictions of the future.

People allow leaders to control them with promises of rewards
(such as, you go to heaven) and/or punishments (such as, you go to hell, or climate change will turn the whole Earth into "hell").

There's no proof any of this will happen -- there's no evidence -- there's no science.

Just predictions of the future by people with no ability to predict the future.

I know it offends many people for me to dismiss all unproven beliefs based on faith. 


But that's what the coming global warming catastrophe is.

(1) Some people believe their future will be spent in heaven or hell, with no proof.

(2) Some people believe a coming climate catastrophe will turn Earth into a hell for everyone, with no proof.


Two different "religions". 

What surprises me is that people who believe in one, will dismiss the other.

To be scientific
(act like a logical, unemotional Vulcan on Star Trek), you can not accept unproven beliefs, both secular and religious, on faith.

Those who claim we are already in the early stages of runaway global warming caused by manmade CO2 .... FIRST have to prove the current climate is abnormal, or even unusual.

That proof does not exist.


There is no evidence for claiming the current climate is abnormal, unusual or even unpleasant.

There is evidence for claiming the current climate is better than it has been for at least 500 years, for humans, animals and plants.