13 things that warmists ignore (all contradictory data)

The (always) coming 
global warming 'catastrophe',
that never arrives,
is a 30-year old 
leftist fairy tale,
used to scare 
the general public,
and create a ( false ) excuse
for more government regulations
( to allegedly save the Earth ).
.
Leftists always want 
more government power.

They hired bureaucrats
with science degrees,
to make scary predictions
of the future climate.
.
The mainstream media,
who are at least 95% leftist,
are the "government parrots".

They ignore the fact that
climate predictions
have been wrong for 30 years,
and publish every scary
climate article, and "study", 
without any skepticism.
.
The mainstream media 
won't tell the general public 
the average global temperature
has only increased + 1 degree C.,
since 1880, and that's based on
over 50% wild guess "infilling",
and under 50% real thermometer 
measurements, and those 
real measurements are 
repeatedly "adjusted"
to show MORE warming !
.
Using honest margins of error 
of at least +/- 1 degree C.,
the actual temperature change
since 1880 could range from 
no change to +2 degrees C.
.
The media won't tell the public 
there was no warming from
2000 to mid-2015, 
and the significant warming
in late 2015, and early 2016,
was caused by a natural
Pacific Ocean heat release 
called El Nino, or ENSO,
which has nothing to do 
with carbon dioxide.
.

.

An amazing amount of
climate facts and data 
are ignored by anti-science
climate change cult members.

The data that are ignored,
are those that weaken 
or contradict, the bizarre
belief in a coming global warming 
catastrophe, that will eventually
end all life on Earth !
.
.
Here is what the 
"global warmunists"
deliberately ignore:
.
(1)

They ignore most climate history, 
which includes hundreds of
long term cooling / warming 
cycles over the past 800,000 years, 
as determined by ice cores and
other climate proxy studies,
so they can falsely claim 
the warming trend since 1850 
is unique.
.
.


(2)

They ignore the 20,000-year
warming trend that has 
caused glaciers to melt, 
raising the sea level, 
by over 400 feet so far,
after the last peak glaciation,
because over 399 feet of the
total +400 feet sea level rise,
is from natural warming,
which can't be blamed on humans!

.
.

(3)

They ignore the fact 
that compilations of local 
temperature measurements,
used to estimate a global average, 
began DURING a long-term 
warming trend (after 1850),
and then they act “shocked” 
every time a new high temperature 
is reached, even though that's
been happening for 167 years,
and will continue to happen,
until the next cooling trend starts !

.
.
(4)

They ignore the fact that thermometers 
still have a poor global distribution,
with VERY few Southern Hemisphere
thermometers before 1900, 
and few from 1900 and 1940.
.
.
(5) 
They ignore the fact 
that a majority of "temperatures"
in the average temperature 
of Earth's surface, which is 
divided into grids, 
are only wild guesses,
officially called "infilling", 
done because there are 
no weather stations
in a majority of the grids !
.
.
(6)
They ignore the fact that 1800's
thermometers tended to read low, 
when checked against accurate 
modern thermometers, so the 
starting point for global warming 
claims, which is 1880, most likely 
exaggerates the global warming 
since then.

.
.
(7)

They ignore an early 1900’s 
change in sea temperature 
measurement methodology, 
from wood to canvas buckets 
-- a methodology change
that coincided with the 
“global warming” at the time.

.

The sea temperature measurement 
methodology was later changed 
two more times !
.
.


(8)

They ignore the abandonment 
of most of the rural USSR 
weather stations in the late 1980’s, 
after the USSR collapsed.

The rural measurements 
had been strongly biased 
by government officials, 
who routinely claimed the
temperatures were colder 
than reality, which got them 
larger allocations of coal 
and other fuels, 
during the cold winters.
.
The total number of surface 
measurements included in 
the average global temperature 
has changed a lot over time, 
peaking in the 1960’s.

.

After the USSR collapsed 
in the late 1980's, the number of
weather stations in operation
fell by about half in four years !
.
.
(9)

They ignore the fact 
that a majority of land 
weather stations in the US, 
the nation claimed to have the
BEST weather station network
in the world, are improperly sited
by US standards, 
with thermometers located
too close to buildings, roads,
runways and parking lots, 
which absorb heat during the day,
which creates global warming
at night when the bricks, concrete 
and asphalt release heat
( that night time warming 
is completely unlike 
what is measured 
at properly sited 
weather stations, 
surrounded by
grass, shrubs, 
trees, etc. )
.
.

(10)

They ignore all weather satellite 
global temperature compilations, 
since 1979, even though satellites
provide near-global data,
with far less infilling 
(wild guesses are only required,
for areas around both poles. )

Weather satellite data,
show LESS warming than
the surface measurements,
and that's puzzling 
because scientists say
the troposphere should reflect 
much MORE warming 
than measured by the
surface thermometers,
because greenhouse warming
actually takes place 
in the troposphere !
.
.
.


(11)
They ignore the fact 
that a “signature” 
of greenhouse gas warming
in the tropics would be
an increasing temperature, 
when moving up in altitude
from Earth’s surface to
roughly six miles up in the 
troposphere ... a "hot spot"
signature that does not exist.

.

Weather balloons and 
weather satellites 
consistently measure
NO temperature increase 
correlating with altitude, 
which is good evidence 
that greenhouse gases are 
NOT the primary cause of 
of the minor increase
of the average temperature 
since the late-1800’s.
.
.
(12) 

They ignore the fact that 
“average temperature” 
is not a real measurement 
of something that exists.

.

Average temperature is a
complex statistical average 
of ever-changing 
local temperatures.

.

There is no single 
global temperature.

.
And statistical averages 
are not real measurements.

.

There is no proof that an average
of local surface temperatures, 
is a meaningful and useful statistic,
especially considering 
the data are from
weather stations whose count, 
locations and instruments 
have changed radically over time 
... and a majority of the "grids" 
in the surface global average 
still have wild guess "infilling",
because there are no thermometers !
.
.
(13) 
The not very smart 
(to be kind)
global warmunists
ignore the very important fact 
that no human can predict the future, 
whether the future climate, 
or future anything else!