Talking Points
Global warming hysteria
is big business
-- the people making
and taking the money
won't change their
climate change
catastrophe
scaremongering,
no matter what
the average temperature
is doing.
In 4.5 billion years
of Earth's history,
only 27 years,
from 1976 to 2003,
happened to have
both manmade
CO2 emissions,
and the global
average temperature,
significantly rising
at the same time.
From that mere 27 years,
when two variables
happened to move
in the same direction
-- which is not proof
that one caused
the other to rise
-- leftists have invented
a phony climate change crisis
that "requires" everyone
to do as they say!
You've got to give
leftists credit
for active imaginations!
The concentration of CO2
in the air has been
higher than it is now
a majority of the time
during the 4.5 billion years
of Earth's history.
CO2 levels on Earth today
are near the lowest level
in thousands of millions of years.
Earth has had
several ice ages
with more CO2
in the air than today
-- up to 20 times more CO2 !
The claim that humans
have caused global warming
has no scientific proof.
The claim that
global warming
has been,
or will be,
harmful to humans
has no scientific proof,
and even no evidence.
The theoretical effect
of rising CO2
on average temperature
is grossly exaggerated
by the UN's IPCC.
The claim that
rising CO2 levels
cause global warming
has no scientific proof,
because there has been
no correlation between
rising CO2 and
rising average temperatures.
Only one relationship
between average temperature
and CO2 has ever been discovered:
- Natural global warming
causes higher levels of CO2
in the air
( Average temperature peaks
were followed by CO2 peaks
500 to 1,000 years later,
as warming oceans released CO2,
based on detailed studies
of Vostok, Antarctica ice cores ).
Earth's climate
is always changing.
Understanding climate change
requires knowledge of:
astronomy,
solar physics,
geology,
geochronology,
geochemistry,
sedimentology,
tectonics,
paleontology,
paleoecology,
glaciology,
climatology,
meteorology,
oceanography,
ecology,
archaeology and
history
-- climate modeling
has nothing to do
with understanding
climate change.
Computer-game
Computer-game
wild guess predictions
of the future climate
are not real science.
Computer models
are not real data.
Climate change
cult members'
false predictions
of a coming catastrophe
have become
more and more
hysterical.
Among dozens of problems
we're told to expect
include only one
that would make sense
if warming returned:
Higher temperatures,
plus dozens of other predictions
that are nonsense:
- Lower temperatures ( stated during 2013/2014 winter )
- Shutting down the Gulf Stream
- Millions of climate change refugees
- Increased cancer, and heart disease, and most important
- A devastating effect on the quality of French wines!
Leftist climate modelers
around the world
take billions of dollars
of bribes (grants) every year
to play computer games
… and the money keeps coming
only if they predict
a coming climate catastrophe !
That's a scam
on taxpayers
around the world.
Predictions of
a coming catastrophe,
hard times, or
punishment by God,
have been used
for many centuries
by political leaders
and religious leaders
to control people.
Predictions of
a coming climate change
catastrophe are scaremongering
-- leftists have created
an imaginary, invisible 'crisis'
for use as a political tool
to control people
and tax corporations
on theor energy use.
The current scare
replaced many prior false 'crises',
such as acid rain,
the hole in the ozone layer,
and global cooling
-- none of which
scared people enough
to control them.
A computer model
predicts nothing
-- it merely restates
the beliefs of the scientist(s)
who developed the model
and wrote the assumptions.
Although humans
love to predict the future,
and hear or read
predictions by others,
predictions of the future
are no more accurate
than flipping a coin.
Predictions of the future
have nothing to do with science.
Global warming itself
is not a scam.
Repeated mild
warming/cooling cycles
are natural
between ice ages.
The claim that the
most recent warming period,
from 1976 to 2003,
was caused by
manmade CO2,
completely unlike
the prior warmings,
measured
with ice cores
in the past
one million years,
and the claim that
future warming
will lead to
a climate catastrophe,
is a scam.
The first 168 years
of our current
“Modern Warming”,
starting in roughly 1850,
has been the
most prosperous
168 years so far on Earth
– warming so far
has been good news
for humans, not bad news!
The only bad news
from the rising level
of CO2 in the atmosphere
is in the overactive imaginations
of climate change cult extremists
desperately trying to
manufacture a 'crisis'
to advance their
century-old
pro-big-government,
anti-corporation agenda.
A brief lesson
on Earth's climate history
from a real scientist:
"Today we remain locked in
"Today we remain locked in
what is essentially
still the Pleistocene Ice Age,
with an average global temperature
of 14.5 C.
This compares with
a low of about 12 C.
during the periods
of maximum glaciation
in this Ice Age
to an average of 22 C.
during the Greenhouse Ages,
which occurred
over longer time periods
prior to the most recent
Ice Age.
During the
Greenhouse Ages,
there was no ice
on either pole
and all the land
was tropical
and sub-tropical,
from pole to pole.
As recently as
5 million years ago
the Canadian Arctic Islands
were completely forested.
Today, we live in
an unusually cold period
in the history of life on Earth
and there is
no reason to believe
that a warmer climate
would be
anything but beneficial
for humans and the
majority of other species."
Patrick Moore, Ph.D.
Statement before the Senate
Statement before the Senate
Environment and Public Works Committee,
Subcommittee on Oversight -- February 25, 2014
If global warming science
was really "settled",
there's no need for
spending any more money
on climate research,
especially the
nearly worthless
computer game models.
It's tough to use facts,
data, and logic
in a discussion
with climate change
cult extremists
because they 'debate'
with character attacks,
slander, and once in a while
they may spout
a few statistics
they don't understand,
which are all false
or grossly misleading,
like trained parrots.