Climate change
"papers"
and "studies"
concerning the
future climate,
are always
wild speculation.
They are
almost always
predictions
of a coming
climate
or ecology
catastrophe.
Any scientist
who "sees"
coming danger,
is much more likely
to be published.
That's because
"climate change"
is a secular religion,
backed only by
junk science,
with scary predictions
of the future climate,
that never come true
... with almost no
real science involved !
Sure, there are lots of people
with science degrees
involved in this religion,
but they remain silent
when politicians claim
"the science is settled".
The science is settled
is the most ignorant statement
about science that one could make
-- science is never settled -- if it was,
why would we need any scientists?
A common theme in
these 'science fiction' studies
is that future climate change
will be "worse than
previously thought."
I started this blog,
as a public service,
in late 2014,
after 17 years of reading
wrong climate predictions.
Since I was reading about
climate science every week,
why not summarize my reading
to share with other logical people?
Readers too smart
to allow leftists
to frighten them
about fossil fuels,
especially when
adding carbon dioxide,
to the atmosphere
is actually beneficial
for our planet,
and harms no one.
It seemed like
leftist authors
were having
a contest,
to write
the scariest
climate change
"campfire story".
Years ago,
I predicted
a future "study"
would seriously claim
that climate change
was going to shrink
'man's favorite organ'.
I saw a "study" this year
claiming climate change
is shrinking male testicles,
which is pretty close
to my prediction !
I saw another "study"
blaming climate change
for lower birth rates.
Well, I've been reading
science fiction "studies"
for 21 years now,
so I know they are
wild speculation
used by people
with science degrees
to get attention,
and hopefully a grant
for further "studies".
In fact, the causes of the
large climate changes
that really matter
-- the 100,000-year
ice age cycle --
is planetary geometry.
There are roughly
90,000 cold years,
followed by roughly
10,000 mild years,
called "interglacials",
in each 100,000
year cycle.
We are living
in an interglacial,
that is about
10,000 years old.
The next
important
climate change
will be the end
of that interglacial
= significant cooling.
Cooling may have
already started,
or will start
in 1,000 years --
no one knows
the exact timing.
If adding CO2
to the atmosphere
causes global warming,
which is an assumption
based only on
lab experiments,
not a proven fact,
then any warming
will serve to delay
the end of the
current mild
interglacial.
Mild global warming
would be delaying
the colder climate
that will eventually put
Chicago and Detroit
under ice again,
which was reality
for most of the past
100,000 years,
and was still true
20,000 years ago.
The unimportant
climate changes,
that get
ALL the attention,
are very gradual
one or two degree
variations
over 100 to 200 years.
Those tiny changes,
wouldn't be noticed,
if not for loud,
braying leftists,
falsely claiming
a climate disaster
is coming,
unless we do
everything they say,
without question.
Those unimportant,
mild climate changes
have a list of suspects,
including CO2,
but specific causes
are NOT known.
That's why expensive
general circulation models
(GCM climate models)
make wrong predictions --
there is no correct
climate change
physics model
to guide the assumptions
that GCMs use
for their simulations
(predictions).