Total Pageviews

Tuesday, November 20, 2018

Definition of "Real Science" versus the definition of "Junk Science"

Science is not 
"right" or "left". 


Science is 
real or fake 


Fake science 
is traditionally called
junk science.

The crisis 
of credibility 
and replicability 
in science, 
usually involves
junk science.

But real science 
suffers from 
corruption too. 



REAL  SCIENCE:

Real science 
is observation of 
real-world 
phenomena.

Real science is 
about observation 
and evidence.

Real science 
must be falsifiable, 
and it is the job 
of real scientists
to look hard
for evidence 
to disprove, 
or falsify, 
their own claims! 

Real science 
is not about 
speculation 
and ad hoc 
explanation-fitting. 

Real science 
is about 
real-world 
observation, 
physical 
measurements, 
and falsifiable, 
testable hypotheses. 



JUNK  SCIENCE:

Junk science pretends
to be real science.

There are people
with science degrees
involved.

Junk science 
is about 
unfalsifiable claims, 
and explanations 
of what we believe 
might possibly be true.


Junk science "experts”
sit around considering 
possible explanations. 

Junk science
explanations 
can't be 
rigorously tested.

Junk science 
is led by 
self-proclaimed 
“experts” 
deciding ex nihilo, 
Ex nihilo is a Latin phrase 
meaning "out of nothing". 
... "creation out of nothing"), 
what the “truth” is,
and then they
declare it to be so. 

Once the so-called 
junk science “experts” 
have spoken, 
their conclusions become 
the absolute truth.

If you disagree, 
and have evidence 
their “declared truth” 
is not correct, 
then the burden 
is thrown on YOU 
to prove, 
beyond any doubt, 
that the “experts” 
are wrong 
( even when 
you have evidence, 
and they don’t ).


Junk science tells us
humans are causing 
the Greenland 
and Antarctic 
ice sheets to melt
from CO2 emissions.

If we ask for pproof,
we are told that we must 
provide evidence 
that this claim 
is NOT true.


That's pure 
junk science