Total Pageviews

Thursday, March 28, 2019

A simple comparison of real climate science and junk climate "science"

After 21 years of reading 
climate science as a hobby,
I know real climate science 
can be difficult to read, 
with many unanswered 
questions about Earth's 
past climate, and rarely 
making predictions 
of the future climate.

Real climate science is
very much unlike modern 
junk climate science,
where the future climate 
is claimed to be known  
with great certainty, and 
anyone who disagrees is
character attacked as a 
"climate change denier",
and scolded 
with these words: 
"The science is settled !"

The leftist politicians, and 
junk scientists they hire, 
focus on communicating
very scary conclusions,
that get lot's of attention,
especially when they are 
stated with great certainty.

Making a scary prediction 
is much more important 
to them than real science !

They don't care that their 
predictions of a coming
global warming catastrophe,
starting in the late 1950's, 
have been completely wrong !

They just make 
the same prediction
the next year !


Real climate science can also
be communicated using simple
language, although real
scientists rarely do that.

I read their articles and studies,
and try to summarize them here
in a simple, easy to understand
way.





Following is 
a simple comparison
of real climate science
vs. junk climate science.

Remember these two facts, 
and you will understand
more about real climate 
science than 99.9% of the 
hysterical leftist junk science
climate alarmists:

(1)
Actual, past global warming,
was 100% good news 
( based on real time 
temperature measurements, 
since the late 1800s )

(2)
Predicted, future global warming 
is claimed to be 100% bad news
( scary climate predictions, 
made since the late 1950s )


So, are you 
going to believe 
real science (1),
based on actual 
temperature 
measurements ?

Measurements are real science.

They reflect mild, harmless,
intermittent warming since 1940, 
but almost no warming 
in the past 15 years.



Or are you going to believe 
junk science (2),
based on nothing more 
than scary wild guess
temperature predictions  ?

Wrong predictions are junk science.

And the predictions have been 
very wrong for the past 60+ years !




If you believe (2), 
the junk science,
and ignore (1),
the real science.
then you are 
a stupid head
( a technical term ),
or a leftist 
( I repeat myself ), 
who probably believes 
Trump won in 2016 
because Russians 
hacked our 
voting machines !

And you should 
be forced to wear 
a T-shirt that says:
The World Will End in 12 Years,
Unless We Listen to 'Perfesser'
Alexandria Occasionally Coherent !