Total Pageviews

Saturday, July 20, 2019

Ten Fallacies About Polar Bears and Arctic Sea Ice


I've summarized 
a longer article, 
at the link above,
which also includes 
a long list of references, 
and links to some of them.


Arctic summer 
sea ice loss 
is ramping up.

That's happened every year 
since the Arctic had ice, 
millions of years ago. 

June 2019 
happened to have 
the second lowest 
sea ice extent area,
for the month of June, 
since 1979.

But in early July 2019, 
there was still ice 
near all major polar 
bear denning areas 
across the Arctic. 


The  Ten  Fallacies:


1. 
‘Sea ice is to the Arctic 
as soil is to a forest‘. 

False: 
Sea ice will always re-form 
in the winter and stay until spring. 

Ice has formed in the Arctic
for several million years.

There has always been ice 
in the winter and spring.

"I am not aware of a single 
modern climate model 
that predicts winter ice 
will fail to develop 
over the next 80 years 
or so. "



2. 
Polar bears need 
summer sea ice 
to survive.  

False: 
Bears that fed on young seals 
in the early spring can live 
off their fat for five months 
or more until the fall.

Polar bears seldom catch seals 
in the summer, because only
adult seals are available then,
and holes in the pack ice allow 
them to escape.

Polar bears and Arctic seals 
require sea ice from late fall
through early spring only. 



3. 
Ice algae is the basis 
for all Arctic life. 

Only partially true: 
Plankton thrives in open water, 
during the Arctic summer too, 
which provides food  for the fish 
that seals eat.

Recent research has shown that 
less ice in summer has improved 
seal health.



4. 
Open water in early spring 
as well as summer ice melt 
since 1979 are unnatural 
and detrimental to 
polar bear survival. 

False: 
Melting ice is a normal part 
of Arctic seasonal changes. 

In the winter and spring, 
open water areas appear 
because wind and currents 
rearrange the pack ice.

The mix of ice and nutrient-laden 
open water that attracts Arctic seals 
and the seals are food for polar bears. 



5. 
Climate models 
do a good job 
of predicting 
the future 
polar bear habitat. 

False: 
The almost 50% decline 
in summer sea ice, 
not expected until 2050, 
actually arrived in 2007, 
and remained steady
since then, yet polar bears 
are thriving.



6. 
Sea ice is getting thinner 
and that’s a problem 
for polar bears. 

False: 
First year ice (less than 2 meters thick) 
is the best habit for polar bears 
because it's the best habitat for seals,
compared with very thick multi-year ice.

First year ice that melts every summer 
creates a better habitat in the spring
for seals and bears in the spring, 
when they need it the most. 



7. 
Polar bears in Western 
and Southern Hudson Bay 
are most at risk of extinction 
due to global warming. 

False: 
Sea ice decline in Hudson Bay
has been less than one day 
per year since 1979 compared to 
more than 4 days per year 
in the Barents Sea. 

The ice-free season in Western
Hudson Bay since 1998 has been 
about 3 weeks longer than it was 
in the 1980s but has not changed 
in the past 20 years despite
lots of carbon dioxide emissions. 



8. 
Breakup of sea ice 
in Western Hudson Bay 
now occurs three weeks 
earlier than it did 
in the 1980s. 

False: 
Breakup occurs 2 weeks earlier 
in summer, than it did in the 1980s. 

The total ice-free season is now 
about 3 weeks longer, but with
lots of year-to-year variation. 



9.
Winter sea ice 
has been declining 
since 1979, 
putting polar bear 
survival at risk. 

Only partially true: 
Sea ice in March has been declining 
gradually since 1979, but there's 
no evidence it hurt polar bears.



10. 
Experts say that with 
19 different polar bear 
subpopulations across 
the Arctic, there are 
“19 sea ice scenarios 
playing out“, implying
this is what 
they predicted 
all along. 

False: 
Biologists at the US Geological Survey 
in 2007 grouped polar bear subpopulations 
with similar sea ice types, and predicted
polar bear survival based on assumptions 
of how the ice in the four sea ice regions 
would change over time.

There was much more variation 
than they expected, contrary 

to predictions.