Total Pageviews

Saturday, August 10, 2019

Reject the precautionary principle

The mass media 
love to publish 
scary reports.

Health scares.

Environmental scares.

Most scares (over 99%)
turn out to be false. 

The failure of a scare
is rarely reported.




In 1981, "scientists said"
coffee caused of 
pancreatic cancers. 

The same scientists
retracted their claim
in 1986. 

The biased left wing 
International Agency 
for Research on Cancer 
took until 2016 
to reverse its claim 
that coffee is a 
possible cause 
of cancer. 




The harm caused by 
believing false scares 
was usually small. 

Until the coming climate
change crisis false scare.

Vast amounts of taxpayers'
money has been wasted.



The cost-benefit test 
was devised to stop 
bureaucracies from 
grossly overreacting 
to every scare.

The cost-benefit test
is hated by bureaucrats.

It demands definitive
proof of harm -- 
not just wild guess 
computer game 
predictions.




Leftists tried to block
cost benefit analyses
with their clever 1992
"Precautionary Principle"
( Principle 15 of the 
1992 Rio Declaration ) 

The precautionary 
principle states: 
“In order to protect 
the environment, the
precautionary approach 
shall be widely applied 
by States, according to 
their capabilities." 

"Where there are threats 
of serious or irreversible 
damage, lack of full 
scientific certainty 
shall not be used a
s a reason for postponing 
cost-effective measures 
to prevent environmental 
degradation”.

The precautionary principle 
gives bureaucrats 
the "freedom" 
to only count benefits, 
and ignore costs ...
or to only count 
imaginary costs,
while ignoring 
real benefits.

This principle reverses 
the burden of proof,
by claiming whether
the science is right
or wrong, does not matter.

We must act now, 
and ask questions later !

For climate change,
the precautionary principle
says:
  'Our imagined costs 
of the coming climate
change crisis are so high,
that everyone must act now,
and do what we say 
without any questions,
because waiting would be
too dangerous.'

The 'principle' allows
climate alarmists to take
the moral high ground, 
while they demand
complete control 
over society. 

The Green New Deal 
is based entirely on 
the precautionary 
principle.